How are C2D's in single core games?

Permabanned
Joined
26 Nov 2006
Posts
3,955
Location
guildford, surrey
In games which dont support dual cores, how would my E6400 at stock (2.13ghz) compare to say a pentium 4? Because games may say things like reccomended specs are 3ghz pentium 4, does my e6400 compare to that in single core mode?
 
Someone will come and give some more details but the short answer is yes your faster than that even just running a single core.
 
Also i have one more question, it isnt exactly about C2D's. But when im setting a resolution in game, there are 2 choices, 1440x900x16 and 1440x900x32. What are the last numbers? I think there something to do with colour, do they actually have any noticeable visual differences or performance hits?

THanks.
 
you're right, 1440x900x16 refers to 16-bt colours and the latter to 32 bit colours. Basically it just means there are more colours :)
 
I'd make sure you use 32bit colour unless you are running a game which came out many years after the card in question and are really struggling for performance. Most modern games don't even give the option run anything other than 32bit.

Back on topic, a C2D is clock-for-clock considerably faster than a P4 even in single-threaded games. A stock E6400 should be fine in games recommending 3ghz P4.
 
I know a 2ghz core 2 duo is as fast as a pentium D @ 4 ghz, so your c2d is as fast as a p4 @ 4.26 ghz in single core apps, and a PD/ 2x p4's @ 4.26ghz in dual core apps...
 
Back
Top Bottom