[TW]Fox;11784120 said:If you think you'll get 28mpg from a 1.8T/2.0T taxi-ing around town you've got another thing coming and thats on petrol let alone LPG.
yup agree here i struggle to get 28 mpg round town in my 2.0 mondy
[TW]Fox;11784120 said:If you think you'll get 28mpg from a 1.8T/2.0T taxi-ing around town you've got another thing coming and thats on petrol let alone LPG.
Well surly you can keep the same bhp and thus use more fuel.
Or you can lower the bhp and use the same out of fuel.
Well presumably you could downtune the engine, but why would any LPG installers do that?
Because the engine would need remapping anyway for lpg. If your fitting LPG then you are doing it to save money a reduction in power on most cars of 10% is not that noticeable.
Errr okay. Even if you do that, you could still do it on the petrol model. So still "LPG returns less mpg than petrol", no?
Because the engine would need remapping anyway for lpg. If your fitting LPG then you are doing it to save money a reduction in power on most cars of 10% is not that noticeable.
Your kind of supporting the argument against LPG here too.
To convert to LPG you have to spend £2k on modding your car, live near and only drive to places near LPG filling stations, loose half your boot space to a massive new tank AND downtune your car so that its slower...
Most supermarkets have lpg it isn't hard to get.
Space in boot for people trying to save money is not a problem. Who uses there boot to max capacity?
Unless you rant it a slight loss of power is not here nor there. For most drivers tehy probably use less than 70% of the rev range anyway.
But of course it's not for everyone.
Same as diesel, unless your doing spaceship mileage it ain't worth it.But a £2k conversion to save money? Doesnt really make sense to me...
And im sure its a dam site more than 10-15%.
If it was benificial more people would do it... but they dont, so clearly there are some issues. And yu cant say people in the UK dont wanna save fuel money, just look at the surge of people buying diesels because "there oh so more cheaper to run like see".
Same as diesel, unless your doing spaceship mileage it ain't worth it.
Same as diesel, unless your doing spaceship mileage it ain't worth it.

1- buy a car with lpg already installed? Here they are no more/less than non lpg cars.Reasons I decided not to LPG:
1) Very large initial cost ~ £1.5 - £2k
2) Highly dubious resale value implications
3) Possible performance implications
4) Lack of garages
5) Low mpg values
6) Short duration tax freeze
7) Increased servicing costs
8) Small tank size
9) Boot size diminished, weighting increased.
10) Lack of any actual enviromental benefits
1- buy a car with lpg already installed? Here they are no more/less than non lpg cars.
2- as said in one, they're worth the same
3- hit the button to switch to petrol when you want a traffic light sprint, back to lpg on the motorway, it switches instantly while driving
4- garages? who needs garages ?
5- 18% lower on my dads rolla 1600cc, while the price is 35-40% the price of petrol
6- True that tax is much more, but if you drive enough it pays back
7- rubbish, what service costs, coz we didn't have any...
8- you don't lose petrol, if anything all your range increases by a lot
9- you mean no spare wheel, these days lpg tanks go into the space for your spare wheel ( G3)
10- yes there are, lpg is more envoirement friendly than petrol
1) & 2) Very very limited supply of lpged cars - although i'm sure possible, finding a properly certified LPG car that you actually want to buy is not easy
3) good plan! Didnt realise you could actually do it whilst driving
4) Meant for actually buying the fuel
6) Meant potential for fuel price to increase
7) You had no separate servicing costs for the LPG bits??
8) Your time between stopping for fuel becomes much shorter due to smaller tank and lower mpg.
9) Isn't that what I said?
10) By very little

, 400-500km isn't a really short range imo (but then again, you might not be considering a 1.6l workhorse
).