1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How many SM's in full fat TU-102 and TU-104 ?

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by ToOo, Aug 21, 2018.

  1. Meaker

    Mobster

    Joined: May 19, 2004

    Posts: 3,508

    So where are they hiding in the die shot?
     
  2. String

    Capodecina

    Joined: Jan 6, 2013

    Posts: 11,990

    Maybe you would be less confused if he had released actual benchmark comparison figures, as opposed to all the cryptic Gigaray patter.
     
  3. 4K8KW10

    Soldato

    Joined: Sep 2, 2017

    Posts: 6,631

    754 sq. mm chip is so large, it is crazy. Why do nvidia even feel the need to release it, when their old Pascal midrange chip was just 200 sq. mm?!
    AMD will completely demolish them with a much smaller chip.
     
  4. orbitalwalsh

    Capodecina

    Joined: Dec 1, 2015

    Posts: 16,033

    Smaller nodes doesn't always mean smaller chips . Means you can cram more into a set area but when you need to cram a lot in.. it's going to get big

    If they cut the RT with 2060/50, should be a nice smaller die
     
  5. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 28,122

    Location: Dalek flagship

  6. Mauller

    Mobster

    Joined: Feb 7, 2015

    Posts: 2,741

    Location: South West

    Yeah, like I mentioned there likely won't be a TU100 but a TU200 on 7nm with a respin of the rest of the series on 7nm as well. I don't see the 12/16nm Turing series being long lived. With 7nm they will also likely be able to increase clocks by 25% giving a performance uplift with the refresh.