How skilled is your use of the English language

You should always try to keep things as simple as possible. If you don't say words in normal conversation, don't add them to your writing unless you want to sound silly or pompous.
 
I'm back in School now learning Swedish and as a Brit it should be easier for me than the Arabic speakers that most of the other class is made up of.

I too completely struggled with categories other than Verbs... I consider myself to be moderately well educated but i do not recall learning any of this at school, I just know how to read and write in English... :p

I'm finding similar for French although I'm only trying to pick it up casually rather than because of any real need. I'm almost certain it must have been taught as many of my contemporaries know the distinctions but it seems to have completely passed me by.

Relatively, you have a high standard of written English. :)

Thank you, I won't ask relative to what though as that might be a bit more telling... :o :D

You should always try to keep things as simple as possible. If you don't say words in normal conversation, don't add them to your writing unless you want to sound silly or pompous.

Indeed, as they say never use a large word when a diminutive one will do.

It's important to be understood firstly so if you can make it easy on your audience that will always help. I wouldn't however always seek to reduce it to lowest common denominator standards though, sometimes it's fun to play with words and if that occasionally means people have to work a bit harder and go look up the odd word then that's ok too. There's probably a happy medium between periodically challenging a reader in an appropriate way and being unaccountably elitist in your writings I suspect.
 
[FnG]magnolia;27660850 said:
I like using in the wrong descriptive word place which makes a problem, for me anyway.

[FnG]magnolia;27661044 said:
Each of the rules, not the problems but good effort sir!

It was meant as a joke as I can't unravel what you're trying to say in the first place. :) It seems to be a direct syntactic problem rather than an overall grammarian one. I have a feeling that I'm missing your point entirely!

Thank you, I won't ask relative to what though as that might be a bit more telling... :o :D

I realise that sounded ominous now! Relative to what I see on this forum (which already has a good standard, as far as the internet goes). You are one of the best writers here. It's something I've noticed. /powerhug
 
Back
Top Bottom