tbh.. I think 'dyslexia' is just a label used for people who are otherwise intelligent but have trouble with reading/writing.
If they didn't do well in other areas then they just be 'thick' but if they can score well on an IQ test then the current thinking is that they need a special label to keep their parents happy.
It wouldn't bother me but it does create a lot of unfairness - for a start you get unfair tests with people having the 'dyslexic' label being allowed extra time. Secondly you get schools dedicating extra resources to 'dyslexic' kids when in reality both kids with low and high IQs who are struggling with reading/writing would benefit equally from extra help.
There is a professor at Durham who has basically stated that after 30 years working in this area he can't really tell the difference between a 'dyslexic' child and a poor reader.
Psychologists have various different 'tests' for it and don't seem to be able to come to an agreement on what really defines 'dyslexia'. IMO it is just a meaningless label - all kids who are poor at reading/writing should get help - wasting time with silly tests and labels just make particular groups feel at ease - i.e. reassuring middle class parents wishing for the best for their kids that little johnny isn't a slow reader hes 'dyslexic' etc...
If they didn't do well in other areas then they just be 'thick' but if they can score well on an IQ test then the current thinking is that they need a special label to keep their parents happy.
It wouldn't bother me but it does create a lot of unfairness - for a start you get unfair tests with people having the 'dyslexic' label being allowed extra time. Secondly you get schools dedicating extra resources to 'dyslexic' kids when in reality both kids with low and high IQs who are struggling with reading/writing would benefit equally from extra help.
There is a professor at Durham who has basically stated that after 30 years working in this area he can't really tell the difference between a 'dyslexic' child and a poor reader.
Psychologists have various different 'tests' for it and don't seem to be able to come to an agreement on what really defines 'dyslexia'. IMO it is just a meaningless label - all kids who are poor at reading/writing should get help - wasting time with silly tests and labels just make particular groups feel at ease - i.e. reassuring middle class parents wishing for the best for their kids that little johnny isn't a slow reader hes 'dyslexic' etc...


) however I just plod through and try my best, I'm slower than most people at working things out, but I seldom get the answer wrong. I have to re-read stuff a couple of times and don't really have "quick" wit, and prefer a slow rational reply to most things - however I don't claim to have any condition at all, some people are just more apt with numbers or have that quick mind - if I was really concerned I'd see a doctor, however I've managed to make it to senior management with a bit of hard work - though I'm good at lateral thinking and managing projects/people and so on, so being numerically minded is not always necessary. 


