@Jim99: That thing you said about writing on the train stuck with me. There’s something about that half-focus space – you’re moving, half-distracted, but also strangely free. I’ve written bits in airport lounges or waiting rooms that somehow felt more honest than when I’m “trying” to write at my desk. Maybe it’s the lack of pressure, like the words can sneak out sideways. Do you ever reread those train-written pages and find they’ve got a different rhythm to them? Less filtered maybe? Also curious: when you did force yourself for a few hours and hit that wall – did you learn to spot the signs early next time, or did burnout just ambush you again before you realised?
@NickK: Your “tree of questions” thing really intrigued me. The idea that it’s not a static list but branches – that’s smart, because a character never answers the same way twice anyway. Did you ever find the research around shamanism bleeding into your characters’ logic, like they started believing in patterns or rituals that you hadn’t planned? It sounds like you were building a whole culture, not just personalities. Do you still have that world in your head somewhere, or did it fade once the writing paused?
@Sankari: Right, non-fiction. That explains the precision in how you plan. I can imagine the satisfaction of structure there – no need to chase voices or moods. Still, do you ever miss that chaos a little? The possibility that a page might suddenly take off in a direction you didn’t expect? Or does clarity itself scratch that same creative itch, just in a tidier way?
@Faser Active: I get what you mean about AI narrowing the field – everyone chewing on the same pre-chewed advice. It’s like creative monoculture. Your thought about only writing when you want to – I wrestle with that. Some days the urge is gone, but if I wait for it to return, the gap stretches for weeks. Do you think there’s a middle ground – showing up even without full inspiration, but stopping before it turns mechanical? I wonder where that line sits for you.
@NickK: Your “tree of questions” thing really intrigued me. The idea that it’s not a static list but branches – that’s smart, because a character never answers the same way twice anyway. Did you ever find the research around shamanism bleeding into your characters’ logic, like they started believing in patterns or rituals that you hadn’t planned? It sounds like you were building a whole culture, not just personalities. Do you still have that world in your head somewhere, or did it fade once the writing paused?
@Sankari: Right, non-fiction. That explains the precision in how you plan. I can imagine the satisfaction of structure there – no need to chase voices or moods. Still, do you ever miss that chaos a little? The possibility that a page might suddenly take off in a direction you didn’t expect? Or does clarity itself scratch that same creative itch, just in a tidier way?
@Faser Active: I get what you mean about AI narrowing the field – everyone chewing on the same pre-chewed advice. It’s like creative monoculture. Your thought about only writing when you want to – I wrestle with that. Some days the urge is gone, but if I wait for it to return, the gap stretches for weeks. Do you think there’s a middle ground – showing up even without full inspiration, but stopping before it turns mechanical? I wonder where that line sits for you.
Last edited:
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
