That argument is just for the sake of it, i don't need to write a report on the subject to convince you, sticking within the confines of my point its strange, anyway ill say monitoring earth changes like i said before, we know they do it already so theres really no argument, i just want to see some of the images, heck i would be happy with a higher resolution image in infrared
No it isn't. You continually refuse to come up with what purpose the images would have. no one is going to spend millions putting a satellite up that has no real purpose. The number of satellites with a full view of earth is probably quite small and their purpose pretty specific.
And while they may well use filters, they are more than likely going to be fixed as the satellite will have a specific purpose. Or they camera itself will be designed for that specific purpose rather than having the filters.
What would the purpose of the visible light camera? Give me a good reason for one and then you may have a point. Until then you don't.