Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Save yourself a small fortune and buy an i7-920 and overclock it. It will easily reach the stock speed of the 975.
Only under very good cooling. It'll do just as well as the 920 on air, a bit better on water, better again under phase.
If you've got money to throw away and are using fairly high end watercooling, look at the 950 as the higher multiplier makes motherboard bsck limits less frustrating.
You won't find many people recommending the 975. As said before, get the 920 and spend the rest of the money saved on ssds or a crossfire setup.
I wouldnt buy a CPU till you find out about the Gulftown that might be out very soon.
Not sure about your budget but i have these ( E2407HDS-B1 - 24" Iiyama PLE2407HDS-B1 Widescreen LCD, 1920 x 1080, 2ms, DVI/HDMI/VGA - 1080p HD Ready) 3 of them should do the trick
975 = waste of dough
Get moar gfx cards/ssds/bigger screen instead.
If you're wanting to spend that much on a CPU, wait for the new 6 core!
Whats it called now the i7 985 or something?
I learnt long ago it is impossible to future proof, at least to keep up to date all the time. The second you spend a fortune trying to future proof then along come DX12 and Shader Module 5, then once again you are completely out of date for the newest games. Save yourself the money and upgrade in small steps over a long period of time rather than a huge upgrade paying a premium for things that within a year will be out of date.
Aka get an i7 920 and OC it to 4GHz-4.2GHz. You will notice NO difference in games between 4 and 5Ghz. You are spending an extra 500 quid on...nothing.
Definitely wait for the 6 core cpus then if you really want to spend that much. It'll be more "futureproof" and the fact that it's on 32nm means that you won't have to worry about new steppings. It will overclock pretty well.
Actually you are wrong lol the 975 and the 920 are EXACTLY the same CPU. The only difference is, is that the 975 may be the CPU range that were picked from the center of the CPU wafer when they are manufactured, so they are very slightly 'better' than the others. This may only mean however, that you can squeeze an extra 50-100MHz out of them, which in reality is absolutely nothing.
CPU's cycle every 2 years~ and in those 2 years the new generation of CPU's almost doubles performance. i7 has been out for a year, in another year the i7 will be out of date and the new generation of CPUs will be out.
You begin to see how the pattern works.
You spend 700 quid on a 975, keep it for 2 years, it is out dated by a year. Pay 200 quid, save 500 quid for almost the same thing. In a years’ time, use 300 quid of that to buy a new CPU. You now have a CPU that is twice as powerful as the one you had, and saved yourself 200 quid. Future proofing is actually a bad investment, same for GPUs.
In about 1 year or more, Intel will release their 8 core CPU, which will make your 4 core 975 look like a terrible investment and leave you feeling like a pranny lol.
As for DX12, a CPU makes no difference, DX12 really only affects graphics. Thus spending over a 1000 quid on a silly OTT SLI investment is another bad idea. Because when it comes out, your DX10/11 cards will be useless if you want to experience DX12.
Yes, but the amount your paying for that extra gain now, will get you a lot more extra gain in the future when it's needed.
If you don't have this amount of cash to dispense without worrying to much, you're going to be kicking yourself in 6 months.
Upgrading components is ALWAYS a game of chasing your own tail. Everytime I buy something I look on the net a week later and already want to swap it!
Do not use the word invest when you're referring to high-end componentsIn 5 years it'll be one of those **** bits we've all got draws full of!
It's mad that people still think that future proofing makes economic sense. Rapid depreciation makes components a terrible thing to invest in. The only sensible time to get a 975 is if you just don't care about blowing £600 on sod all performance or if you're going for phase cooling and really care about 300mhz.
The standard argument is buy a fast computer now, it'll still be fast far into the future. While true, it can't justify the price gap between 920 and 975 as they'll last exactly as long as each other.
Id say my 920 x58 system will keep me going for a few years now, last rig was an intel q9550 on a p45 board, awesome quick system, could have lasted another year or so, but i got the upgrade bug, i7 was the top platform to go far, and im extremely glad i did, being primarily a gamer i have the option of xfire or sli at full blown x16, very nice at my res of 1920x1200, no other platform could offer this, that and the fact that a 4ghz i7 encodes video files so quickly, 6 minutes to convert an avi to dvd, my dvd drive takes 20 mins to burn the disk.
If i where you id get the 920.For me it gets to a point of diminishing returns.you can get the 920 for £210 or the 975 for £785 for just a few % performance increase.I would just bank the extra £550 and then sell your 920 when the new I9 arrives(Id wait a week or 2 after they are released for the price to stabalise) Then you have a good chunk of money for your new CPU.
PS What is your rig to be used for
IIRC i think the 930 is due to be released at the end of Feb that will replace the 920 .It is supposed to be at the same price point.I think its clocked slightly higher at 2.8 as well as probably a few other revisions(power saving etc).If it is released then there may be some bargains to be had on the existing 920 stock.(Hopefully)