Ideal FSB setting

Associate
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
10
So is there such a thing as an ideal FSB setting for an overclocked system?
Is 200 out of question? I want a high level of performence but also a system that will last years and not overstress the components.
 
Really need more details...
Computing power doubles every two years, if you really want high performance, you don't want to sit on a half speed system in 2012.
 
Well I'm not looking for a number to plug in on a specific system. I am planing on an i3 and overclocking to around 4ghz, but my question is about overclocking in general. What kind of FSB speeds can be achieved? Can 200 be run stable? How much stress does that put on the motherboard n RAM exct.
 
I want a high level of performence but also a system that will last years and not overstress the components.

I wouldn't worry about it. I know of a Socket A (Barton 2500+ mobile) that was only retired last year, running 24/7 with a 30-something % overclock the whole time (on air), a socket 939 rig (opty 146) which was retired 2 weeks ago with a 25ish% overclock, again 24/7, a socket 478 (p4 northwood) that's got a 25% o/c which is still running....

As *most* people will upgrade their rigs well within every five years (yeah, ignore the guys I mentioned above!), saying that overclocking reduces the lifespan of your chip is not necessarily true. If you buy a chip and plan to upgrade within 5 years, then that chip's lifespan is 5 years, not the 25 or so that the manufacturer expects (who is really going to be running a chip 25 years down the line?!).

Obviously there are exceptions to this, especially when it comes to overvolting and overheating, but if you keep everything within the safe levels, you'll throw away/sell a perfectly good, albeit dated chip when you move on to your next rig.

Saying that though... almost all cpus these days have more grunt than the majority of people know what to do with!
 
I see, but what about the RAM n motherboard, that dosent stress them to hard to be running that faster? To me it seems changing the multiplier would much safer since it would only tax the CPU. To bad the multiplier is locked.
 
Back
Top Bottom