If a plane flew horizontal

Sorry I thought you were. No worries.

No we used to take O levels between 14-16 and then A levels from 16-18, just like the GCSE to A level system now. So you can see the way in which they moved the goalposts somewhat and have been doing so ever since.

However was there not a two tier exam system when O levels were taken, those that couldn't do O Levels were bumped down to CSE(?) levels?

In a way it would have made sense to amalgumate O-Level and CSE levels together to make GCSE, whilst taking some of the more advanced O-Level stuff and dumping it in the A-Level syllabus?
 
However was there not a two tier exam system when O levels were taken, those that couldn't do O Levels were bumped down to CSE(?) levels?

In a way it would have made sense to amalgumate O-Level and CSE levels together to make GCSE, whilst taking some of the more advanced O-Level stuff and dumping it in the A-Level syllabus?

Yes there was, however if what you say is true, the exams were still dumbed down, were they not?

Anyway this is off topic so As I said it is arguable, but this isn't the thread to argue it.
 
Yes there was, however if what you say is true, the exams were still dumbed down, were they not?

Anyway this is off topic so As I said it is arguable, but this isn't the thread to argue it.

To an extent yes, bu considering a large proportion of people didn't do O-Levels (CSE instead) then it makes sense to do it the way they did.

Just pointing out that there were probably mitigating circumstances to the "dumbing down". :)
 
To an extent yes, bu considering a large proportion of people didn't do O-Levels (CSE instead) then it makes sense to do it the way they did.

Just pointing out that there were probably mitigating circumstances to the "dumbing down". :)

Indeed, and I agree to some extent. Most of the alleged 'dumbing down' is supposed to have arisen during the curriculum changes of the late 90's and 2000's anyway according to most academics and Universities.
 
Back
Top Bottom