Deleted User 298457
Deleted User 298457
Utter dribble. I know people with sport science that are now QS', folk with psychology degrees I lean on daily to tweak internal comms and training materials (behavioural science is a big part of getting old doris to work differently) and history of art folk are my best execs as they actually have interesting things to talk about other than the basics of their job which they'll learn on the job anyway.On the point of university numbers, I think to justify all of the 'unused' degrees, you have to think about the total social benefit.
If you go to university and read engineering, medicine, law etc., you are learning useful skills and when you enter a job to use those, you bring a tangible benefit to society.
When you go and read sport science, psychology, history of art etc., and get a job that has literally nothing to do with those things, there's very little actual benefit to society because you got your degree. Gaining that degree allowed you to rank yourself above a large number of people for job prospects, but it didn't do a lot for the actual benefit of society.
When you consider than in terms of the context of university places compared to how many people we need picking fruit... it's easy to see that the notion of being too good to pick fruit because you are _capable_ of earning a degree, doesn't lead to an efficient outcome for the economy on a wide scale.
Fruit picking is slave labour and paid poorly, that's why no one wants to do it - degree or not.