If LPG is so good..

Soldato
Joined
25 Dec 2008
Posts
5,976
Location
Sheffield/Norwich
..Why don't car manufacturers offer it as factory options?
And why don't they command a significant premium on the used market?
 
I found it good in my Range Rover. Made my 4.6 V8 cost as much, in fuel, as the diesel equivalent, but with keeping the noise, and at least most of the power of the big petrol.

I would have it again without problem.
 
when it works... and when it doesn't knacker your valve seats... or worse if it isn't set right.
 
[TW]Fox;26786274 said:
Because it's not that good?

in what way?

Ive ran it for over 2 years without fault. same performance, just about the same mpg, but at nearly half price. just filled up today at 59.9ppl....
 
Volvo make Bi-Fuel cars that come with LPG out of the factory.
They also MultiFuel, which is Petrol, CNG and E85.

Mercedes used to make NGT versions of the W211 and B class. Not sure they still do though.
 
Last edited:
So some reliability issues meaning you'd need to check it's done right..
Yeah you lose a bit of boot space normally.
 
Limited refilling infrastructure, loss of boot space, limited range, increased complexity, reduced performance. Will completely vanish when all the 20 MPG petrol cars die; their replacements are not so inefficient. At least diesels only suffer from a bit of complexity and rough running to get good economy.
 
It is largely due to demand. the idea that its just not that good is false, it has huge benefits.

When some one buys a new car they typically wont be interested in paying several thousand pounds on top for a duel fuel system. Most people will only keep the car for 2-3 year and in that time it is unlikely that they will make a significant saving to justify the upfront cost unless they plan to do huge mileage. Also most people spending money on a brand new vehicle are either not that hard up, or are already stretching their budget.

In many other countries duel fuel is much more popular. in Brazil for example there is a huge percentage of cars that run on natural gas or alcohol. They are also quite popular in parts of eastern Europe from experience.

Another factor is that you only really enjoy the benefits of LPG if you are doing the mileage to warrant it. If you are only doing a few thousand a year you are only going to save a few hundred pounds and given the addition maintenance and the chance for complex components that could fail it would be a waste of time.

People often view them as problem cars second hand so they carry little additional value. Despite the fact that in most cases you could run them on straight petrol anyway. A large amount of the installs are done on the cheap which can cause problems and there are few mechanics out there that are familiar with dealing with them (trust me!). Having said that the technology is now at a point where you don't have to spend a fortune to have a reliable LPG kit.

Basically if you are doing a lot of miles or plan to keep the car a significant amount of time LPG is a great option. You will keep the benefits of a powerful petrol with a significantly reduced fuel bill.
 
I think the people criticising it are either people who've never actually used it, or people who've seen cars with poorly installed kits and assume that it's the norm for LPG.

A high quality kit installed by a professional should not give you any problems. My dad's got a Jeep with the 5.7 Hemi engine which was converted at 10k miles, and is still running perfectly on LPG at 70k. He averages 17MPG on LPG, which gives him an equivalent 30MPG, as LPG costs 60-70ppl here. In Europe, it can be as low as 40/50ppl which is very useful on road trips.

The main issue surrounding LPG is simply that it's a cost saving measure, and is favoured by the kind of people who like to save money. Which means that they skimp on the kits, installation and maintenance, which leads to problems just as it would with any type of car. Get a car owned by the right kind of person, or pay for a good conversion yourself, and you'll be fine.
 
Back
Top Bottom