Trouble is you can never separate that. We vote a PM in to make choices. his religion, is just a another aspect of his personality. You can't separate that from him. It also would be totally wrong to only allow atheists to run for PM. I think we're as pretty much state and religion separated as we can be.In theory it is but in practice it perhaps isn't so clear cut, the UK had Tony Blair who made no secret of his Christianity (not that he should have to) but if memory serves he has mentioned before that he believes God approves of his decisions. George Bush has definitely made such claims, appeal to a higher power saying "well the big man upstairs thinks I'm right" is a shocking justification if that is all you have. Such a justification should be between yourself and your conscience, the nation doesn't need to know about it. Religious freedom is great, believe in what you like, let others believe in what they like but don't force it onto anyone and keep religion out of state.
RE is fine, even good, but that means you must teach about all religions (at least the main ones) and then allow the child to make an informed choice, as an educational establishment there should be no foisting of the one which the head of the school believes in onto the children. If the children want to believe they will and they should have that right independent of what the school does.
Re shouldn't be about converting, it Should just be about taking the top say 10 religions and teaching kids the difference and what they our about, there thought processes and beilives. Nothing more.
Some other people have, so I just aided it inI've not mentioned the national anthem or the Queen. I made no proposals to end or change either of them, they make such little impact to my life that I barely think about either of them.![]()
