Images from Fast Five Shoot "Fast and Furious
- Thread starter the shadow
- Start date
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
Maybe there's a special late night edition with that in it?
Out next thursday
Runtime 2 hours 10 minutes
Argh, one of my pet hates. They're entertaining films for 90 or so minutes but they're not deep involving storylines so why try to stretch them out to over two hours - I don't care about the value for money argument, quality over quantity (although some people will argue they're not even got any quality no doubt). Some films should be relatively short and that's fine but I don't see why so many films are padded out to meet a longer run time when they're naturally a quick blast sort of thing.
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2006
- Posts
- 9,272
- Location
- Around Town
Yep entertaining film for 90 min no longer. i hear this ain't the last one perhaps they will do a spin about the rock eh ? 
In March 2011, series producer Neal H. Moritz stated in an interview that the sixth and final film of the series is being developed.Yep entertaining film for 90 min no longer. i hear this ain't the last one perhaps they will do a spin about the rock eh ?
According to wikipedia
Just got back in and it was brilliant. 
Stupid amounts of action, lots of needless destruction, few laughs and cheesy moments, but it was great. Bit let down with the quality though, I don't know if it was the cinema's fault, but some parts looked really blurred and out of focus, especially close ups on images and text. Never had any problems like that in the cinema before, hoping it was just a one off, but didn't ruin the film thank fully.
Stupid amounts of action, lots of needless destruction, few laughs and cheesy moments, but it was great. Bit let down with the quality though, I don't know if it was the cinema's fault, but some parts looked really blurred and out of focus, especially close ups on images and text. Never had any problems like that in the cinema before, hoping it was just a one off, but didn't ruin the film thank fully. It's actually quite good. I certainly recommend it - thrills, spills, and a few laughs along the way. Never going to win any awards for acting prowess but that's just not what it's about.
I still think the first movie is better though.
I still think the first movie is better though.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 11,364
- Location
- Cheshire
I saw this last night, can definatly recomend going to see it. Suprisingly good! 8/10
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,776
I've got nobody to go to the cinema with so I'm gonna wait for this to come out on Blu-Ray. 
So far on IMDB it has a 8.3 star rating, 1,106 votes.
The Fast and the Furious: 6/10 75,900 votes
2 Fast 2 Furious 5.2/10 50,000 votes
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift 5.6/10 41,000 votes
Fast & Furious 6.4/10 44,000 votes
So far looking good, can't wait to see to
The Fast and the Furious: 6/10 75,900 votes
2 Fast 2 Furious 5.2/10 50,000 votes
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift 5.6/10 41,000 votes
Fast & Furious 6.4/10 44,000 votes
So far looking good, can't wait to see to
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
Not wanting to disillusion you too much but many big release films have a high initial rating as it's the fans who will normally rush to see it first and then the rating will slowly subside to a more realistic appraisal after a few weeks/months. It might be that this film is utterly fantastic but to merit an 8.3 it's got to be better than Casino, Butch Cassidy & The Sundance Kid, Life of Brian etc and I'll admit to entertaining some doubts...
True true
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 12,510
- Location
- Northants
Did everyone stop and see the extra bit halfway through the credits, kind of sets a plot up for the next one!
