Imageshack is so annoying

[WatchTower]

I've been having problems with imageshack for days even thought I keep my jpeg images under 1.5mb firefox keeps coming up with connection reset because the site takes forever to either upload my image or respond. Dam it's drives me crazy. Anyone else having problems with Imageshack?

 

[alexakasloth]

It's annoying for me too, most of the time the images don't show

 

[Greenlizard0]

Aye I'm finding them to be a pain in the arse, I try to load up my image products for crap I'm selling on ebay and I know they're not loading up in any reasonable amount of time..

 

[KNiVES]

yeah, imageshack has been incredibly slow as of the last two or so months. Anyone recommend any other non-sign up free image hosting sites?

 

[Sp00n]

Imageshack has been very irratic as of late, a few people i know cannot see images because of DNS issues so i just don't bother using them anymore and stick all my stuff on my isp space.

 

[ruffneck]

tried using Photobucket?

seem okay to me

 

[Azagoth]

I've been having problems with imageshack for days even thought I keep my jpeg images under 1.5mb firefox keeps coming up with connection reset because the site takes forever to either upload my image or respond. Dam it's drives me crazy. Anyone else having problems with Imageshack?

Exactly the same here. 90% of the time I'm getting the server reset error, also in Firefox by the way.

 

[Sp00n]

tried using Photobucket?

You have to register dont you?

 

[Lysander]

You have to register dont you?

Erm what's wrong with registering? I love having an account there - great place. Would never use Imagecack.

 

[KNiVES]

Not a fan of hosting sites that ask you to register.

 

[platypus]

Erm what's wrong with registering? I love having an account there - great place. Would never use Imagecack.

Its just the whole ease of use thing of Imageshack.

 

[Lysander]

But once you've registered you can upload stuff just as easily. It probably takes more time screwing around with Imagecack waiting for the thing to work than registering on Photobucket.

 

[furnace]

I have imageshack images blocked using AdBlockPlus because they take so long to load. However, if you use an american proxy a lot of the time they seem to work fine

Google for "free image hosting". Imgplace is my favorite right now

 

[trojan698]

That's the price you pay for not having to sign up.

 

[platypus]

But once you've registered you can upload stuff just as easily. It probably takes more time screwing around with Imagecack waiting for the thing to work than registering on Photobucket.

I realise that once you're registered its usually just as good, but before Imageshack started performing so badly, the ease of use couldn't be beaten.

And registering just gives your details to more marketing companies.

 

[trojan698]

And registering just gives your details to more marketing companies.

Since when? You can opt out when signing up. I've had my photobucket account for years and still don't get any spam.

 

[Chronos-X]

Registering means you can recall your pictures later...

I use photobucket and the registry patch that lets you publish from Explorer - perfick!

 

[Sp00n]

Registering means you can recall your pictures later...

So does copying + pasting the image link

I just like the simplicity of going to a site, browsing for a picture and clicking upload.

 

[marc2003]

i use imageshack quite a lot. no problems here.

xs.to is a simple alternative though.

 

[1337z0r]

Use my upload site if you want. Sign up no need for email validation... www.images.multi-game.co.uk will be fast reliable space is 150MB doe pictures so upload .