Induction hob or Gas

Man of Honour
Joined
31 Dec 2005
Posts
4,867
Location
England
Hi guys, one of my friends is raving about these saying you save more and there very efficient compared to gas, I'm changing my kitchen worktops soon so perfect time to upgrade

Please can someone tell me the advantages of these?

This winter I've been spending £12 a month on electric and £50 on gas (excluding daily service charge)

What size mcb would be needed in my consumer unit for one?
 
My info might be well out of date - but I never thought of induction hobs as being something you'd get to save money. They're expensive, the cookware that works with them is expensive. Have to admit I don't know if they're cheaper to run though.
 
My info might be well out of date - but I never thought of induction hobs as being something you'd get to save money. They're expensive, the cookware that works with them is expensive. Have to admit I don't know if they're cheaper to run though.

Induction is also more expensive to run - always cheaper to minimize energy transitions, e.g. from fuel into heat with gas is much more efficient than fuel into heat into turbine movement into electricity, subtract line losses then convert electricity into heat.

Which is why the efficient water heater will use gas.
 
I've had them all and prefer gas over induction. For me the only advantage induction has is it is easier to clean. However if you can't have gas then induction is much better than a regular electric hob.
 
You're about 3x for electricity but I could well imagine induction hobs are 3x as efficient compared to gas hobs. If I had the choice I would be getting a good quality induction hob.
 
I am all electric - no gas in area - got Induction hob and built in double oven - Run oil fired boiler and NPower have just reduced my direct debit from £39 a month to £31 a month - so tell me if they are expensive to run - We cook real meals - nothing ready made or frozen.

I do find the Induction better than the Ceramic hob we had.

Dave
 
Induction is also more expensive to run - always cheaper to minimize energy transitions, e.g. from fuel into heat with gas is much more efficient than fuel into heat into turbine movement into electricity, subtract line losses then convert electricity into heat.

Which is why the efficient water heater will use gas.
That makes sense - but on the other hand, the induction has an advantage because of the heat that it generates, much less of it is waster I imagine (since only the cookware itself heats up, not the hob, and not the air around it (except from heat radiating from the pan)). I don't know which of these factors makes the most difference.
 
Induction is claimed to be more efficient, at least by 20 percent. You directly heat the bottom of the pan without having to heat the hob surface, or losing heat to the air before it's even had a chance to heat the pan. The magnetic field heats the base of the pan directly, and so it works much more quickly and efficiently. You can get a frying pan smoking hot in 30 seconds or get a pan of water boiling like you're using an electric kettle. Certainly our bills have gone down since we switched from gas cooking to electric.

Induction hobs are much easier to clean and keep looking good because they don't generate heat, so they don't bake spills onto the glass. They get hot from having a hot pan sitting on the glass, but they don't carbonize spills like a gas ring or halogen does. Induction cookware is all over the place now, so it's not expensive, just look for the induction compatible label.

You also get the benefits of things like automatically switching off when detecting no pans on the hob, alarms, timed switching off of individual rings, locks to stop kids or cats turning the hob on, etc.

If you had solar panels on your house, it would also make a lot more sense to go induction (as my in-laws have just done), because you're better off cooking with free electricity than paying to cook with gas.

I've used gas, halogen and induction, and induction is my favourite. I've converted a few friends and family to them as well, because they've seen mine in action. Maybe the very purist chef might not want to go away from gas, but for most people there are benefits. I certainly wanted to stick with gas for our new kitchen having lived with a halogen for a few years in my younger days, but my wife insisted on induction, and it's completely the right decision for us, and probably most other people.

What size mcb would be needed in my consumer unit for one?

IIRC, I've got 40 amps in mine just for the hob. You may need new wiring, because they can suck a lot of power. They also need one of those big 40 amp isolation switches, like you get for an electric shower. You don't fuse them as a fuse would melt under load, they go direct to the consumer unit on their own circuit, and you use the MCB as a breaker. The back of the unit the hob sits in also should have a cutout for ventilation, as there is a fan in the bottom of the unit to cool the electrics.
 
Last edited:
I don't think a hob would really make much of a contribution towards ones energy bill.. Induction is faster, just as controllable and easier to clean but might require new pans.
 
Just like to add to Steampunks post regarding ventilation - We had our kitchen designed and told them we were having Induction hob - No ventilation was allowed for - according to instructions there should be a 20mm or so gap below worktop and the start of draw or door you have under worktop - this should be door or drawer width. - We have found that short cooking - boiling veg etc is OK but doing stew for 3 hrs and utensils in drawer below hob get quite hot - Wife has overcome this with wood wedge in top drawer to keep it open by 1"-2" or so. - There was no other option as the whole set of units are sealed except for vent along bottom but heat doesn't run down.

Dave
 
the only thing i hate about gas hobs, is cleaning them, compared to something you can just wipe over
 
Electricity costs more than gas. Induction is also instant. It is like gas in everyway. It will heat a pan of water quicker. Induction only heats the pan so it is very efficient. Only 40% of energy from gas actually heats the pan. Induction is over 84%. Induction can cost 40% less to run. http://www.targetcatering.co.uk/tar...duction-hobs-v-gas-hobs-do-the-facts-stack-up

I have induction and it is rated to use 13 amps max. Very convenient.
 
Last edited:
If you go induction you may also need new pans. Cheap induction hobs also give off fairly large amounts of electromagnetic radiation so not the best health wise.

Just stick to tried and tested gas.
 
If you go induction you may also need new pans. Cheap induction hobs also give off fairly large amounts of electromagnetic radiation so not the best health wise.

Just stick to tried and tested gas.

Gas emits electromagnetic radiation too. ;)
I only had an issue with one cheap pan. The rest were fine.

We have some of the strictest regulations on potentially harmful emissions of any kind including for gas.
 
Last edited:
To be honest I find much more electromagnetic radiation being given off from things like lightbulbs or the sun. :rolleyes:

Ignoring ignorant scaremongering I'd still go for gas over induction though.
See my thoughts on induction here.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18463016

I think the circle of heat you describe must be a feature of some inductions hobs. I haven't noticed it on mine. I find it heats much more evenly than previous ceramic hobs I have used. Gas is good in this regard too.
 
Cheap induction hobs also give off fairly large amounts of electromagnetic radiation so not the best health wise.

LOL seriously?

Anyway, gas because everything works on it and you can lift pans for stir fries etc without the heat source stopping. The fact that an induction hob shuts itself off and / or doesn't work when you lift a pan up is a deal breaker and the reason that hardly any pro kitchens use them.
 
Back
Top Bottom