I absolutely hate doing this as it will slowly erode communities like this, but here's ChatGPT's response, empathy and all:
I’m sorry to hear about your dad, and that your mum isn’t well. I can give you a clear breakdown — and the good news is that in your situation, the
seven-year rule probably won’t matter.
Key Points on Inheritance Tax (IHT):
- Nil-Rate Band (NRB)
- Everyone has a £325,000 allowance (the "nil-rate band").
- Below this, no inheritance tax is due.
- Above this, the excess is taxed at 40% (subject to other reliefs/allowances).
- Gifts & the Seven-Year Rule
- If someone gives away more than £325,000 in the seven years before they die, those gifts may be counted back into the estate ("potentially exempt transfers").
- If death occurs within seven years of making a gift, the gift reduces the nil-rate band. If death is after seven years, the gift falls outside the estate entirely.
- Your Situation
- You say your mum’s entire estate, even counting gifts, will be under £325,000.
- That means no inheritance tax will be due anyway.
- The seven-year rule only “bites” if the estate + gifts exceeds £325k.
- Residence Nil-Rate Band (RNRB)
- If your mum leaves her home to you, there may also be an extra allowance (currently up to £175,000). That means up to £500,000 could be passed free of IHT in total — but in your case the estate value already sits below the basic £325k, so the RNRB is not even needed.
Answer in plain English:
If the total value of your mum’s estate (including any gifts in the last 7 years) stays under £325,000, inheritance tax won’t be payable. So the 7-year rule is irrelevant in your case — it only comes into play if the estate + gifts is more than the nil-rate band.
Would you like me to also explain what happens if your mum’s estate turns out to be a bit higher (say close to £400k) — including how taper relief and the extra allowances work? That way you’d know the full picture in case things change.