Inside Apple's iPod factories

Associate
Joined
25 Jun 2004
Posts
1,569
Location
in the clouds
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=14915


Apple's iPods are made by mainly female workers who earn as little as £27 per month, according to a report in the Mail on Sunday yesterday.


The report, 'iPod City', isn't available online. It offers photographs taken from inside the factories that make Apple music players, situated in China and owned by Foxconn.


The Mail visited some of these factories and spoke with staff there. It reports that Foxconn's Longhua plant houses 200,000 workers, remarking: "This iPod City has a population bigger than Newcastle's."


The report claims Longhua's workers live in dormitories that house 100 people, and that visitors from the outside world are not permitted. Workers toil for 15-hours a day to make the iconic music player, the report claims. They earn £27 per month. The report reveals that the iPod nano is made in a five-storey factory (E3) that is secured by police officers.


Another factory in Suzhou, Shanghai, makes iPod shuffles. The workers are housed outside the plant, and earn £54 per month - but they must pay for their accommodation and food, "which takes up half their salaries", the report observes.


A security guard told the Mail reporters that the iPod shuffle production lines are staffed by women workers because "they are more honest than male workers".


The report also explains that the nano contains 400 parts, and that its flash memory is the most expensive component. The report looks at several salient components of the nano, and describes the product as a reflecting the global way business works today. This is because the iPod nano contains parts developed by technology companies from across the planet.


Apple is just one of thousands of companies that now use Chinese facilities to manufacture its products, the report observes. Low wages, long hours and China's industrial secrecy make the country attractive to business, particularly as increased competition and consumer expectations force companies to deliver products at attractive prices
 
I thought that would have been a given due to the mass marketing and cheap production every big company wants, ah well it's not so good sometimes. Pity I can't see the pictures because that site won't load, grr.
 
I hate all this crap about us underpaying them. People will only work if they WANT to, no one makes people work. If they want to work for that salary, then we're actually doing them a favor.
 
It's very easy to criticise but under the circumstances Apple is probably the best employer in their area. It even houses them for christ's sake. What more could you ask for?
 
As the report has said, Apple is just one of hundreds or even thousands of companies that pay peanuts for work done outside of fully developed countries, only really highlighting it a little with the whole iPod generations methinks.

Zefan said:
I hate all this crap about us underpaying them. People will only work if they WANT to, no one makes people work. If they want to work for that salary, then we're actually doing them a favor.

Well, if they want to live, and afford to buy food, then they do have to work. I doubt any of them WANT to work, but when there is very little work around and a huge population of people wanting work, then it gets difficult.
 
Zefan said:
I hate all this crap about us underpaying them. People will only work if they WANT to, no one makes people work. If they want to work for that salary, then we're actually doing them a favor.
Your absolutely right, but I think you are missing the point that compared to a westerners monthly wage of even around £1000 from working in KFC, people are getting 'ripped off' as it were.

I don't know why this is aimed at apple anyway, pretty much ALL major multinational companies abuse lesser developed countries like so.

Edit - Forgot to add what DaveyD mentioned, most of the workers have very little choice of where they can actually work. There isnt a huge amount of choice of where you can earn money.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what the alternative would be for these people? Dying maybe?
 
DaveyD said:
Well, if they want to live, and afford to buy food, then they do have to work. I doubt any of them WANT to work, but when there is very little work around and a huge population of people wanting work, then it gets difficult.

What I was trying to outline is that we're actually doing them a favour by creating jobs that they can earn money from. We're helping them live and at a level they're willing to accept for working the hours.




(Can anyone smell S.C?)
 
Whats the problem exactly ?

Most companies have similar factories paying workers virtually nothing.... including my own corporation. We have 4 or 5 factories in the far east - where the average hourly wage is about 90p. In the UK, we pay on £13 an hour for a similar position.

I don't really see why Apple is being singled out..... there are far worse corporations where employees are treated like animals. And anyone that doesn't already understand how cheap labour works in this day and age must have been living on an Island for the last 30 years or so - its been that way for years - and will probably always be that way. We buy the products - even when we know how they are made - because we want the cheapest item we can get.
 
Zefan said:
People will only work if they WANT to, no one makes people work.

Really? Thats fantastic. I dont actually like working, so I guess I'll just stop.

Im sure the bank will be cool about the mortgage payments, and I've no doubt that the supermarkets would be willing to forego payment for my food. And Im certain that the utilitiy companys will give generously for my heat and light needs.....All I need to do now is to convince Spie to give me some free PC components and I'm sorted.....
 
Ricky Gervais said:
I was reading into poverty and all that, and I found out an interesting fact. A sweatshop worker in china is paid something like £2.50 a week, whereas the director earns over £100k a year.

For the worker to earn £100k, they would have to work something like 20 hours everyday, for over 100 years...



But they don't want to! Lazy..
 
Visage said:
Im sure the bank will be cool about the mortgage payments, and I've no doubt that the supermarkets would be willing to forego payment for my food. And Im certain that the utilitiy companys will give generously for my heat and light needs.....All I need to do now is to convince Spie to give me some free PC components and I'm sorted.....

Give it a whirl, the gypsies, sorry - travellers seem to manage ok.

Exception of course is the free PC components - lol, I think you got a bit carried away there.
 
Nitefly said:
Your absolutely right, but I think you are missing the point that compared to a westerners monthly wage of even around £1000 from working in KFC, people are getting 'ripped off' as it were.

I don't know why this is aimed at apple anyway, pretty much ALL major multinational companies abuse lesser developed countries like so.


Of course, you're also missing something very important that no one else in this thread has mentioned:

Cost of living.

so what if they're paid £25 a month. Their cost of living is probably much less than that anyway. Apple wouldn't get any workers if they weren't paying the staff sufficiently enough for them to live on.

Someone earning £1000 per month in the UK could probably just about afford to rent a place where I live, and cover essential bills,food and have some money left at the end of the month for basic luxuries.

Someone earning $1,838 a month in the US would probably find things a little more comfortable, given their cost of living is lower than ours, like accomodation costs and stuff (although they have extra taxes and health insurance to cover), hence their average wage is lower over there.

Its all about relative scales.
 
like already said i cant afford to cover my cost of living on my wage, so its all good in the hood. In fact, their wage covers half so they should get half their current wage each month, thus making ipods cheaper for everyone aswell!
 
On a wage of £27 a month, they would just about afford one iPod in a year.

Quite a large divide between how much we pay for stuff, and how much it costs to make them.

Not saying I have a solution, and not saying that maybe £27 isn't fair... it just seems a bit strange that we in the West want expensive things, which clearly aren't very expensive at all to make, and the middle man (Apple) wants to make huge profits.

Ah, capitalism.
 
Back
Top Bottom