Insurance costs more after you get a full licence????

Soldato
Joined
27 Apr 2012
Posts
3,705
Location
London
I cannot believe that, I got my full licence and called my insurance to inform them about the change, I was riding my scooter using my full car licence + CBT for 3 years before that.
They told me that my insurance will have an increase on the premium because it will show as a new licence, how stupid is that???
 
Last edited:
This is normal for the vast majority of car drivers that pass the test, because they will have been under instruction by an instructor or family member before passing it.
But i've never heard of it happening with motorbikes in over 30 years of biking. In fact it's normal for insurance to go down a bit after getting a full licence. As wazza says, get another insurer.
 
My insurer didn't do this although when I called them it was to add a new bike to the policy. I'm still shocked at the price of my insurance considering that I'm 34 and loads of quotes were above £1000 and some between £2-3k:eek:
 
I understand the logic in this on a car, because you are now able to drive alone without a 'responsible adult and experienced driver' in the car with you... But, on a bike.. Where you were always alone?!
 
I would switch. There should be no reason for it if you're not changing your policy details in any way other than full license.
 
I spoke to them again and it will remain the same price.. Instead of changing my licence type on the policy, they added a note to it stating that now I have a full licence.
They said if they change the policy, the system will understand as a new licence and will charge more for that.


I would like to keep this insurance so I don't lose 7 months of NCB (I have 2 years and 7 months NCB on this policy)
 
I spoke to them again and it will remain the same price.. Instead of changing my licence type on the policy, they added a note to it stating that now I have a full licence.
They said if they change the policy, the system will understand as a new licence and will charge more for that.


I would like to keep this insurance so I don't lose 7 months of NCB (I have 2 years and 7 months NCB on this policy)

The limitation of a system should not be an excuse that is given to customers. pretty bad when you think about it - "sorry I can't do anything of think out side the box to help you as the computer doesn't allow me to do so".

MCN compare is a good place to search for. It's the only place I know that asks if you have a car licence and how long you have had that for as well as the bike licence...might be worth checking on there and reporting the prices back to them?
 
Full licence = Carrying pillion + motorway riding + possibility of new, bigger, faster bike = more dangerous = higher insurance.

Complete logic failure.
1) You can almost always exclude pillion cover and get a reduction in premium.
2) The mere possibility of being able to ride a more powerful bike is meaningless, unless he's actually bought said bike and is trying to insure it.
 
Full licence = Carrying pillion + motorway riding + possibility of new, bigger, faster bike = more dangerous = higher insurance.

You are wrong in so many lvls :)
Carrying pillion - I already could carry a pillion because it is a moped and I have a full car licence, if you have a full car licence and cbt you get a full MOPED licence, so you don't even need to do CBT again after 2 years if you are only riding a moped...
Motorway - it is a 49cc limited to 30mph so I cannot go to a motorway even with a full bike licence...
possibility of new, bigger, faster bike - it is the same "bike"...
 
Carrying pillion - I already could carry a pillion because it is a moped and I have a full car licence, if you have a full car licence and cbt you get a full MOPED licence, so you don't even need to do CBT again after 2 years if you are only riding a moped...

Only if you got your car license something like 25 years ago
 
You are wrong in so many lvls :)
Yeah, but some girls are into that kind of thing, ya know... ;)

Oh, you mean about the facts... well:

Carrying pillion - I already could carry a pillion because it is a moped and I have a full car licence, if you have a full car licence and cbt you get a full MOPED licence, so you don't even need to do CBT again after 2 years if you are only riding a moped...
That's nice for you...
But the vast majority of riders, especially those riding scooters, will not be in that position. Insurance companies base a lot of their pricing on statistics, rather than getting to know you personally in depth and detail.
Statistically, riders new to a full bike licence will be entering into situations completely new to them with no practical training behind them (you don't get to practice carrying a pillion or going down motorways before you do the big bike test), so are higher up the risk tables. This is why their system flagged you up when they tried to alter the policy... and they probably charge something insane like £50 admin fee for changing your licence type, £60 admin fee for changing your policy, another £25 admin fee for changing your personal details and so on...

Motorway - it is a 49cc limited to 30mph so I cannot go to a motorway even with a full bike licence...
But again, the full licence allows you the *possibility* of hopping on a 2300cc motorcycle and going blazing off at 190mph down the M4. Statistically, this is what a certain percentage of other riders have already done and will continue to do, so an increase in all our premiums is there to offset the risk/losses from these statistics.

possibility of new, bigger, faster bike - it is the same "bike"...
[/quote]
Again, nice for you...
But the fact remains that a full licence means you are now legally able to go out and get whatever bike you want. Also, having fully comprehensive insurance does mean you can also ride any bike you like, so long as you have the owner's permission, while remaining TPO covered.
It's not about what you've got - It's about what you are now legally allowed to do and statistically might do.

Complete logic failure.
Go tell that to the insurance companies then, mate - It's their policy, not mine. I'm just talking about why/how they come up with these insane things!!

1) You can almost always exclude pillion cover and get a reduction in premium.
Yeah?
Might wanna tell this to Carole Nash then, as I wouldn't consider 5p less to be an actual reduction...!
Other companies have actually refused me this, unless I physically removed the pillion pegs and handrails - The basis was to do with how the MoT worked and the capability requirements.

2) The mere possibility of being able to ride a more powerful bike is meaningless, unless he's actually bought said bike and is trying to insure it.
See riding other bikes under Comprehensive Insurance...

If you think this is stupid logic, you should see how they work out the value of your vehicle after an accident and why they can decide a simple £50 repair job on an exhaust counts as a Cat C write off!
 
It is not about knowing me personally, it is the fact that the riding conditions, vehicle and anything else will stay the same, apart from that now I'm officially more qualified to ride, so makes no sense to costs more.

If it was a bigger bike, that would allow me to go to motorways or would change another riding factor you could be right but that is not the case.

My licence allows me to ride a bigger bike yes, but we are talking about my current bike's insurance, it already covered me to carry a pilliow and it is a third part only insurance, so I'm not covered to ride any other bike.
 
it shouldn't cost more,it should become cheaper,thats the whole point of passing tests

its like taking your advanced driving/riding test and paying more for insurance after passing it

soon as the three months are up and you gain another year no claims id be ringing around for something cheaper
 
It is not about knowing me personally, it is the fact that the riding conditions, vehicle and anything else will stay the same, apart from that now I'm officially more qualified to ride, so makes no sense to costs more.
They are basically looking for anything that statistically might put you in a higher risk category and thus incur higher charges. It may be as simple as Summer approaching, at which point more of their customers are on the road and having accidents, so they put everyones' premiums up to offset the anticipated payout increases. So nothing to do with you personally, just a general thing.

I never said any of this made sense...!
 
You've been lumped in with all the other nuggets that have just passed, and they're probably all going to die.
 
Technically (in the eyes of the insurer) you've gone from having 3 years of riding experience, to none. Stupid, I know.

I was infuriated with insurance companies last year in May. After years of being on all sorts of bikes, tonnes of road experience... I was told "No, your experience on the motorbike licence doesn't count'.

I was treated, and still am until May as a new driver on the road. As a result, I'm paying thousands for insurance and my compulsory excess is £3,000...

Luckily, the policy has finished now and I'm going to be moving onto another insurer soon. From searches I've done, it's gone down from a few grand (I know right!) to a few hundred. It's absolute daylight robbery and I don't know why nothing has been done for insurance companies to be put into place.
 
Back
Top Bottom