lol ditto /me leaves...seek said:i thought this was going to be yet another thread about muslims.
It's not really going to help here - the point is the "obvious" substitution has the same derivative as the top bit of the fraction, which makes doing it that way easy-peasy.Psyk said:I seem to remember the completing the square method from A-level but I was never much good at it. Pretty sure it could be used to integrate equations of that form.
Nairn, you shouldn't be getting logarithms here. You only get those if the top of the fraction is the derivative of the bottom, which isn't the case here because of the square root.SoSolid said:The answer I got was: 2ln(x^2 + 2x + 5)^-1/2 + c . I do not know if I am correct in terms of what I have done with the square root?