• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Demos 80-Core Processor

Associate
Joined
15 Jun 2006
Posts
2,178
Location
Amsterdam
This CNET News story reports that Intel demoed a prototype PC processor with a whopping 80 cores to members of the press last week. The processor, which can handle 1 trillion floating-point operations per second, is expected to be released in five years. The demo chip ran at 3.16GHz and used a special motherboard and cooling system made especially for the demo (and no it can't run Windows Vista since it is not based on the x86 instruction set).
At 0.95 volts and 3.16 GHz - the clock speed that was indicated at the fall developer forum - the processor provides a data bandwidth of 1.62 Tb/s and a floating point performance of 1.01 TFlops, according to Intel. About ten years ago, Intel needed more than 10,000 Pentium Pro processors to achieve a similar performance. Even more impressive than the chip's speed is its power consumption: At 3.16 GHz, the CPU consumes 62 watts, which is less than the firm's current Core 2 Duo desktop processors and about half of the firm's 2.66 GHz quad-core Xeon X5355 processors (which are believed to provide a floating point performance of about 50-60 GFlops).

Intel claims that it can scale the voltage and clock speed of the processor to gain even more floating point performance. For example, at 5.1 GHz, the chip reaches 1.63 TFlops (2.61 Tb/s) and at 5.7 GHz the processor hits 1.81 TFlops (2.91 Tb/s). However, power consumption rises quickly as well: Intel measured 175 watts at 5.1 GHz and 265 watts at 5.7 GHz. However, considering the fact that just 202 of these 80-core processors could replicate the floating point performance of today's highest performing supercomputer, those power consumption numbers appear even more convincing: The Department of Energy's BlueGene/L system, rated at a peak performance of 367 TFlops, houses 65,536 dual core processors.
 
Shame I count see the piccys :( wonder how big that sucker is? I bet the standard heatsink looks like an alloy wheel ! Actually that gives me an idea, i could wip the spare 16in alloy outta the car!

Mind you I knew directx10 would need some re-development but isnt that just a tad too much ?!?!

Top postie :D

Alf
 
It won't be a x86 processor, it'll be some sort of RISC processor with a limited instruction set to keep the size down.

Jokester
 
spot on mate...


A major limitation of the current 80-core chip is that it is not based on the X86 architecture. Instead, it uses a 96-bit Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) architecture, another architecture currently used in the Itanium server processors. A major hurdle that Intel hinted at will be moving from VLIW to X86 on its 80-core chip. .
 
WHAT!!! said:
if they are getting 80 cores on a processor how big is the processor ?

They must be using a oversized one surely ?
Each core is only very basic. They don't have any out-of-order pipelining for instance. They really are very dumb and slow individually. But when added together with the right software you get a highly parallel processor.
 
NathanE said:
Each core is only very basic. They don't have any out-of-order pipelining for instance. They really are very dumb and slow individually. But when added together with the right software you get a highly parallel processor.

so similar to sonys 'cell' processors used in the PS3?
 
Back
Top Bottom