• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Sunny Cove(Ice Lake and Comet Lake) examined in more detail

Caporegime
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
25,435
Location
Planet Earth
Last edited:
Very good for the laptop market and it's gonna be interesting to see what this new architecture is capable of. I suspect their "up to 4.1 GHz" claim might be taking a leaf out of AMD's book, i.e. we won't actually see any chips that hit that speed for more than a second. I notice they're officially supporting DDR4 @ 3200 MT/s too, something they've never done with their Skylake derivatives.

Was the last time Iris Pro graphics were seen in Broadwell-C?

Intel claims an ~18% IPC improvement, which means that their "up to 3.9 GHz" @ 15 W Ice Lake-U parts wouldn't quite match their "up to 4.9 GHz" @ 15 W Comet Lake-U parts, unless of course they have better sustained frequencies relative to the 14nm parts. They're also stuck on 4 cores whereas Comet Lake-U will probably have up to 6. The 9 W versions and improved graphics look tasty though.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't bother me since I don't have a laptop.

But these 10nm chips are still exciting for low power laptop users.

You can have a ultra thin or high battery life unit while still maitaining great performance.

Even though it's 4c/8t - at 3.8/3.9ghz and just using the Geekbench results we've seen - they are on par with a gaming 5ghz i9 laptop in single thread
 
Anandtech preview an Ice Lake based laptop:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14664/testing-intel-ice-lake-10nm

They used 3733MHZ DDR4 and the Coffee Lake systems used 3200MHZ DDR4,but it is unclear if the RAM was run at that speed or 2133MHZ.

111758.png

111763.png

111764.png

111765.png

111766.png


111797.png


However,the model tested was $426:
https://twitter.com/IanCutress/status/1156941140286955521

This is for a 4C/8T model - it appears anything over 6C for mobile is still based on Coffee Lake.

Its lucky for AMD Intel is still stuck at 14NM for desktop,and Ice Lake is still only a 4C/8T CPU.
 
Last edited:
dont be daft, the reason for lower clocks is the tdp limit. on desktop where they can pull 80+w of power wont be surprised if base clock is 5ghz.
If they could get anywhere near that they'd be releasing them on desktop, there's only one sku with a base clock higher than 1.3ghz
 
dont be daft, the reason for lower clocks is the tdp limit. on desktop where they can pull 80+w of power wont be surprised if base clock is 5ghz.

Unless they call the maximum boost clock of a single core "base clock", this new 5 GHz "base clock" is technically impossible.

My Ryzen 5 2500U has a documented "base clock" of 2 GHz, but most of the time sits at 1.47-1.50 GHz, with boosts to 3.00 GHz, and very rarely maximum turbo clocks for 1 core of 3.60 GHz.
 
Anandtech preview an Ice Lake based laptop:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14664/testing-intel-ice-lake-10nm

They used 3733MHZ DDR4 and the Coffee Lake systems used 3200MHZ DDR4,but it is unclear if the RAM was run at that speed or 2133MHZ.

111758.png

111763.png

111764.png

111765.png

111766.png


111797.png


However,the model tested was $426:
https://twitter.com/IanCutress/status/1156941140286955521

This is for a 4C/8T model - it appears anything over 6C for mobile is still based on Coffee Lake.

Its lucky for AMD Intel is still stuck at 14NM for desktop,and Ice Lake is still only a 4C/8T CPU.





SPEC2017 is another one of those benchmarking tools that claims its a measure for real world performance but uses its own code IP.

Every generation since Ivy Bridge Intel have used benchmarking tools to claim a 15% IPC increase that then turned out to be 3% in the real world.

Having said that the 1065G7 looks impressive on the face of it, its scoring 461 ST in Cinebench, that's at 3.9Ghz, yet somehow with Intel's "+18% IPC" rhetoric i was expecting more than that, i score 482 at 4.1Ghz, that's 5% higher clocked than Ice Lake with 5% higher score.

So Ice Lake matched Zen 2 IPC, and that's not "+18% IPC" its about 10%.

I also think by the time this gets to Desktop we will be talking about Ryzen 5000
 
Back
Top Bottom