Nicola has a vote to fund.No one outside of England gets it. The devolved administrations will receive around £576 million and it'll be up to them how they use it to provide support.
Nicola has a vote to fund.No one outside of England gets it. The devolved administrations will receive around £576 million and it'll be up to them how they use it to provide support.
I'm 99.9% certain they will, yes.Will the rates increase again by the end of the year?
Yes, but do your sums/ask your broker to do your sums. Also, consider whether you would sell - as whilst you can port, you are tied into the provider you initially went with and not all of them have the best rates/allow porting.Will the rates increase again by the end of the year? I ask because I’m going to hopefully have a mortgage drawn out for my first house purchase and current rates are fine and would probably lock it down for 3-5 years to weather the storm
OK thanksYes, but do your sums/ask your broker to do your sums. Also, consider whether you would sell - as whilst you can port, you are tied into the provider you initially went with and not all of them have the best rates/allow porting.
Reason I say do your sums - I did a 5 year fix on my property. After just 3 years it had gone up in value by ~20% which, through no effort on my part, had made my loan-to-value 70%.
I had signed up to my 5 year fix with just a loan-to-value of 90%. This meant if I was free to chose a new provider, I could have been locking in a juicy <2% rate from April.
Obviously rates "only have one way to go", but that is exactly what I thought when I initially locked in 3 years ago.
In my experience:I also don't get the "single people hogging a 3 bed semi" argument. There was barely any difference in price between 3 bed semi and 2 bed flat, so I got the house. It's only about 800 sqft, which is smaller than the victorian 2 bed terraced I grew up in up north, and seeing as I'm down south now it cost about 3x the price.
I strongly believe that all property adverts should be required to display sqft in a clear and filterable way because it's a much more useful metric than beds and baths.
Well actually, nobody really knows. Everything points to further rate increases, though they should be at least 5% already and a few 0.25% increases is going to do nothing as far as inflation goes.Will the rates increase again by the end of the year? I ask because I’m going to hopefully have a mortgage drawn out for my first house purchase and current rates are fine and would probably lock it down for 3-5 years to weather the storm
New build 4 beds near me (they're all detached):In my experience:
4 bed Edwardian Semi - 3500sq ft (ex. loft)
4 bed 60's Detatched - 2500sq ft (ex. loft)
What's a 4 bed new build now <2000sq ft (inc. loft)?
Our 4 bed semi (built 6 years ago) is 123m².In my experience:
4 bed Edwardian Semi - 3500sq ft (ex. loft)
4 bed 60's Detatched - 2500sq ft (ex. loft)
What's a 4 bed new build now <2000sq ft (inc. loft)?
If the housing stock is good then that is a dimension that should be considered.New build 4 beds near me (they're all detached):
low end: £470k ~ 1,200sqft
high end: £600k ~ 1,650sqft
The lofts aren't usable by default, but I suppose you could board it and put something light like xmas decorations up there.
If the housing stock is good then that is a dimension that should be considered.
Where I live most of the houses are £800-900k for 1000sqft. A vast majority of stock is owned by single/dual/investor occupants who moved in decades ago.
Agree with this, it seems to be a very British way of doing things, overseas most properties are assessed only on SQM and the cost per SQM, which makes a lot of sense.I also don't get the "single people hogging a 3 bed semi" argument. There was barely any difference in price between 3 bed semi and 2 bed flat, so I got the house. It's only about 800 sqft, which is smaller than the victorian 2 bed terraced I grew up in up north, and seeing as I'm down south now it cost about 3x the price.
I strongly believe that all property adverts should be required to display sqft in a clear and filterable way because it's a much more useful metric than beds and baths.
Yup, in the uK , cost is linked to number of bedrooms which is dumb to say the least.Agree with this, it seems to be a very British way of doing things, overseas most properties are assessed only on SQM and the cost per SQM, which makes a lot of sense.
In our block here in the UK there are smart / posh 1, 2 and 3 bed flats. A 3 bed is approximately 20 SQM more than a 2 bed, but costs 250k more to buy (market rate)!!! that works out at an additional cost per SQM for the additional 20m of 12,500 pounds per SQM, which is madness in my opinion.
In Europe, where we live most of our time, it is purely an assessment of the cost per SQM x the apartment floor area, bedrooms etc. don't come into it.
We own our home. No mortgage.
I don't know how people survive with 1k mortgages...
I agree, in making a purchase decision, i.e. is the home right for you, room configuration plays a role, it has too, but it shouldn't really be used as a defining number for the valuing of a property. For that an assessment of actual property space, or floor area seems more sensible.I'm not convinced sq/ft or number of bedrooms are exclusive measures of usefulness. For e.g. I want to go on holiday with my 2 year old and separate rooms, not floor space, is absolute priority.
Similar I've seen very large sq/ft houses poorly divided/space wasted on hallways.
An 800sq/ft 3 bed for example is a great starter home for a family of 2 + 2. An 800sq/ft 2 bed is useless for a 2+2 family.