I love how the bar of the use 'militant' is much lower for an atheist than it is for a believer. Isn’t a militant someone engaged in warfare? When was the last time you saw Dawkins with a rocket launcher?
The problem here is atheists are being held to a lower level of what expected of them, unless you STFU and keep you non-belief to yourself then you are labelled a ‘militant atheist’, whilst of course the religious can go around ‘spreading the word’, selling books on the subject, doing talks and the like and yet that is fine and not ‘militant’.
Go and turn on a Sky box for example and show me how many hours a week are aimed at the religious and how many are given to people like Dawkins. So you’ll sit by with nearly 100 ‘God Channels’ and with the BBC practically becoming a spokesperson for the Anglican church every Sunday (Songs Of Praise, the Big Questions etc) but Dawkins gets two documentaries on Channel 4 and suddenly we have a ‘militant’ on our hands.
Have you ever been to hotel and found one of Dawkins’ book in the room? I haven’t but I’ve found plenty of Bibles. Are there buildings all over the country whose only purpose is to covert and maintain people into atheism? No but there are countless churches, synagogues and mosques.
If Richard Dawkins, by releasing a few books, doing a couple of documentaries and being a public speaker make him a ‘militant’ then that must make your average vicar an ‘extremist’.