Iran at it again.

Nix

Nix

Soldato
Joined
26 Dec 2005
Posts
19,841
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8385275.stm

Iran's government has approved plans to build 10 new uranium enrichment plants, according to state media.

The government told the Iranian nuclear agency to begin work on five sites, with five more to be located over the next two months.

It comes days after the UN nuclear watchdog rebuked Iran for covering up a uranium enrichment plant.

The White House said the move was "yet another serious violation of Iran's clear obligations".

Meanwhile, Britain described the news as "a matter of serious concern" and potentially a "deliberate breach" of UN resolutions.

Western powers say Iran is trying to develop nuclear arms. Iran says its nuclear programme is peaceful.

The country insists it is only doing what is allowed under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

But a UK Foreign Office spokesman said: "Reports that Iran is considering building more enrichment facilities are clearly a matter of serious concern.

"It would be a deliberate breach of five UN security council resolutions. We will need to consider our response."

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement: "If true, this would be yet another serious violation of Iran's clear obligations under multiple UN Security Council resolutions and another example of Iran choosing to isolate itself.

"Time is running out for Iran to address the international community's growing concerns about its nuclear programme."

'Hard line'

BBC Tehran correspondent Jon Leyne says Iran's move is a massive act of defiance that is likely to bring forward a direct confrontation over Iran's nuclear programme.

The West will fear this move will speed up Iran's ability to make a nuclear bomb, our correspondent adds.

President Ahmadinejad's immediate purpose may be to up the stakes in the diplomatic standoff, and use the issue to try to consolidate his position at home.

By taking such a hard line, the president could outmanoeuvre critics trying to use the nuclear issue against him, our correspondent adds.

Iran says the new plants would be of a similar size to its main existing one at Natanz.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told his cabinet that parliament had ordered that Iran should produce 20,000 megawatts of nuclear energy by 2020.

It therefore needed to make 250-300 tonnes of nuclear fuel a year, he said, which would require 500,000 centrifuges for enriching uranium.

Natanz has nearly 5,000 working centrifuges, with plans to build 54,000 in all.

Under the plan Mr Ahmadinejad presented to the cabinet, the level of enrichment would also be increased.

On Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) passed a resolution that was heavily critical of Iran for covering up a uranium enrichment plant near the town of Qom.

Earlier on Sunday it was reported that the Iranian parliament had urged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government to reduce co-operation with the IAEA.

Jon Leyne said:
Iran says the purpose is to produce peaceful nuclear power. But the country's first nuclear power station at Bushehr is still under construction and others remain on the drawing board. Under this plan, Iran would increase its production of enriched uranium from just under one metric tonne last year, to up to 300 metric tonnes a year. It's hard to see how this quantity of enriched uranium would be needed any time soon, especially as the fuel for the Bushehr reactor is supplied by Russia.

President Ahmadinejad is also calling for his cabinet to approve a move to increase the enrichment to 20%, up from 5%. The aim, presumably, would be to supply the Tehran research reactor, following the breakdown of an international deal to provide fuel for it. But some Western analysts say Iran does not possess the technical know-how to fabricate fuel rods for the reactor.

This is only going to end badly and as each day goes by, the threat of bombing becomes more likely.

Iran have turned away offers by the UN to enrich their uranium off-state, so the fact that they're still pressing ahead is either one of stubborness, or the dubious reality that they really are pursuing nuclear weaponry. I know this has been discussed before, but I felt it fair to start a new thread on the subject as the old ones tend to very quickly become a quagmire.
 
Last edited:
Just to play devil's advocate, why can't they enrich their own Uranium?

Because Israel will bomb them and kick off a great big ****storm? Not saying that is a good reason but more than likely to happen - isn't like the good old USA is going to hold the leash back is it.
 
Personally I don't see anything wrong with them doing this. They have said its for nuclear fuel so they can produce 20,000 more mega watts of electricity by 2020. For once I wish we'd just leave them alone and let them lead their own country instead of just threaten them lol.

Sure its a risk but if we dont just trust them we'll end up going to war again for no sodding reason -.-
 
Because Israel will bomb them and kick off a great big ****storm? Not saying that is a good reason but more than likely to happen - isn't like the good old USA is going to hold the leash back is it.

When are Israel going to comply with the UN and have their nukes inspected?
 
Just to play devil's advocate, why can't they enrich their own Uranium?

:p

This has been done to death so I can only give my own personal take. I don't trust Iran's leadership or the dogma which cloaks the region in affairs it has absolutely no place.

I have faith in Iran's younger generation, but the recent events surrounding the election showed very much who's in control there. It's a scary prospect, but Iran certainly want nuclear weaponry - and they will only want such technology to either upset the status-quo (which is never a good thing especially when concerning the introduction of WMDs) or quite simply to use it. The region is unstable enough as it is with conflicting religions and the geo-politics of oil at play. It's like giving a sharp knife to an autistic, unstable child; someone is going to get hurt.
 
Personally I don't see anything wrong with them doing this. They have said its for nuclear fuel so they can produce 20,000 more mega watts of electricity by 2020. For once I wish we'd just leave them alone and let them lead their own country instead of just threaten them lol.

Sure its a risk but if we dont just trust them we'll end up going to war again for no sodding reason -.-

If it is only for nuclear fuel, then why are they not willing to enrich their uranium off-site (other countries do it) and quite possibly at a profit?
 
I wish we'd hurry up and enrich some bloody uranium, get our sorry arses off coal power.

Aye

Theres a difference between weapons grade uranium and just an enrichment facility for nuclear fuel. The actual report says nothing about weapons but people automatically think nuclear weapons and WW3 lol
 
If it is only for nuclear fuel, then why are they not willing to enrich their uranium off-site (other countries do it) and quite possibly at a profit?

Because Iran wants to be just left alone and self sufficient to as much of a degree as possible?
 
It's OK, they only want enriched uranium to power their mosques. Or something.

Nothing to see here.
 
Because Iran wants to be just left alone and self sufficient to as much of a degree as possible?

Yes, agreed, but as they say with great power comes great responsibility, and Iran is responsible for proving they are willing to let everyone see that it is being done for peaceful means. (no one should be allowed to poses something of such destruction, making one to have one is scarily pointless, and we should be removing them and discouraging others)

They are either doing this to wind up the western world, or to hide the fact they are making nuclear weapons. (really both of which are childish for any civilised nation)
Its already been made very clear to Iran by Israel they do not trust them to not nuke them, so if they don't play nice, all hell is going to break lose.

Could they be doing it to site a reaction and make Israel look bad. It would work to get a lot of middle eastern sympathisers, without actually having to make a nuke and make themselves look bad.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like they are trying to goad Israel into striking them so they can play the victim card to the PC brigade at the UN.
 
When are Israel going to comply with the UN and have their nukes inspected?

Don't know and I don't really care to be honest as to date Israel has acted responsibly with nukes (pity about everything else but can't have it all eh!). I'd rather no country had such potential options from enrichment but unfortunately once Pandora's Box is open well it's a bit too late. Iran will just go ahead anyway as is their right. My post was to merely suggest Israel will not stand by idly one would assume. And I'd rather if we did not get in a silly military conflict where we would lose again to prevent Iran.
 
Iran will just go ahead anyway as is their right.
As I see it, there is the problem. No one has the right to own a nuke. Its not necessary, in fact its very unnecessary.
Its like that retarded American rule about the right to bare arms, that really works doesn't it ;):D, and lets be honest, the world is not a harmony of people getting along, I wouldn't want my neighbour owning a shotgun if I knew he was annoyed at me.
 
Back
Top Bottom