Is it controversial for something to be uncontroversial?

One

One

Soldato
Joined
24 Aug 2011
Posts
6,162
Location
ABQ, NM
This seems to be the new word that modern journalists love to use.

Just reading this article, under the picture we see the quote "The controversial episode was aired on Channel 4 last Sunday." However, upon reading the article we only see a complaint, there is no counter argument being made; where is the controversy? In this article it seems a few neighbours complaining about longer opening times creates a 'controversial pizza shop'.

A simple news search of the word controversial and you see it being misused all over the shop. A simple disagreement or dispute is not a controversy. Controversy might be a synonym of dispute but unless we are now living in a 1984-esque world, where 'happy' has the same meaning as 'elated', then I think we can see 'controversy' should be withheld for occasions where there is a state of prolonged public dispute or debate.

When we use these words with no thought, they lose their gravitas. By misusing the word we are putting a television episode and pizza shop on the same pedestal as the right for a woman to have an abortion. Why is it that our society requires medical staff to be qualified, certification to install a boiler, you even need a license to drive a car, and yet there is no qualification or standard required to inform the population of the truth. There is often very little background checking or number work and more often than not the population is simply lied to.

Very recently we were told that there was just 100 cod left in the sea, we then had a celebrity sperm bank being announced on national television. When is quality of output going to be held in higher esteem than quantity and speed of output?
 
Last edited:
See it used on Match of the Day a lot by Alan Hansen and them,

"That decision to put Gerrard in defense was controversial" :rolleyes:
 
I think there is a huge mass exodus of people leaving their brains behind, when they should have thought of these things better. It's not really brilliant to overuse true tautologies to the point where they become overexaggerated.
 
Newspapers are the worst. Apparently, in their vocabulary:
There is no such thing as anger, only FURY
There is no such thing as unhappiness, only MISERY
One cannot criticize, one can only SLAM
If something doesn't go quite to plan, it's immediately a SHAMBLES
 
Controversial thread is uncontroversial...;)

The word Controversy in modern usage doesn't really imply a level of dispute or the relative importance of a dispute or disagreement, it is simply indicating that there is an issue under debate with defined opposing positions, but I take your point that in many cases the word Controversial is used when possibly Contentious is more appropriate.
 
Controversial thread is uncontroversial...;)

The word Controversy in modern usage doesn't really imply a level of excitement or the relative interest of a dispute or disagreement, it is simply indicating that it is boring crap trying to be spun otherwise

FTFY. No need to intellectualise the fact that 99% of UK journalism is designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
 
Just read a nice quote:

The daily press is the evil principle of the modern world, and time will only serve to disclose this fact with greater clearness. The capacity of the newspaper for degeneration is sophistically without limit, since it can always sink lower and lower in its choice of readers. At last it will stir up all those dregs of humanity which no state or government can control. - Sören Kierkegaard, The Last Years: Journals 1853-5

It seems they had the same garbage 200 years ago :p
 
Last edited:
Just read a nice quote:

The daily press is the evil principle of the modern world, and time will only serve to disclose this fact with greater clearness. The capacity of the newspaper for degeneration is sophistically without limit, since it can always sink lower and lower in its choice of readers. At last it will stir up all those dregs of humanity which no state or government can control. - Sören Kierkegaard, The Last Years: Journals 1853-5

It seems they had the same garbage 200 years ago :p

Wow... spot on :D
 
Back
Top Bottom