Firstly, my rig:
I'm using a Athlon 64 X2 3800 @ 2.0Ghz (stock) 2GB DDR RAM, 250GB SATA II, BFG Geforce 8800 GTS 640, 19" Widescreen, 1440x900, 75Hz. And I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate, just recently installed, was using XP.
Is overclocking a processor worth the hassle/chance you could burn it out? purely from a performance gain point of view. I know overclocking is a hobby for quite a lot of you, therefore I am hoping your knowledge will be exstensive in how much performance you'll get from it, beacause I imagine the first thing that comes after a stable clock speed would be a benchmark.
I've read somewhere that it's possible to take a 3800 X2 to 2.65, however I don't know if there would be any restrictions as far as the motherboard goes. I've read somewhere that the ASrock939-Dual SATA II has a voltage limit, and a frequency limit of 2.74, but I saw that someone had managed to take a proscessor, same as mine, to 2.5Ghz on that board.
I don't know much about my system, but I know I don't wanna be using my pc then all of a sudden my prosc melts from heavy usage, at full load both cores run about 50, according to core temp, and from what I've heard if I had the arctic cooler it'd run about 15-18 less. So if I overclock I'd wanna stay at stock voltage, and overclock purely to gain some extra performance.
I get bottlenecked quite a bit, I mean bioshock runs smoothly, average at 30 FPS. with full settings and DX10 maxxed. When I used XP it ran better, but no DX10. Medal of Honor Airborne ran pretty bad on XP, then I forced on all settings on GPU at nvidia control panel, and it ran smoother, on Vista it runs slightly worse...
So, with Crysis on the horizon, and I get the feeling my cpu let me down by that little bit on XP, and marginally more with Vista. I feel a performance increase is needed for Extra Stability. My card can easily max theese games, but my Prosc struggles.
So, I ask you, would the performance gain, overclocking from 2.0Ghz, to 2.5 make a reasonable, and noticable increase in performance to actually warrant halving the life of my CPU? I mean, would a 3800 clocked at 2.5Ghz, match the performance of a Proscessor running at 2.5 Stock?
I don't know how overclocking works, performance wise, I've read faqs, both here and on toms hardware. And my uncle knows what he's doing, but y'know I just wanna get some advice/opinions from people who've done it.
I'm using a Athlon 64 X2 3800 @ 2.0Ghz (stock) 2GB DDR RAM, 250GB SATA II, BFG Geforce 8800 GTS 640, 19" Widescreen, 1440x900, 75Hz. And I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate, just recently installed, was using XP.
Is overclocking a processor worth the hassle/chance you could burn it out? purely from a performance gain point of view. I know overclocking is a hobby for quite a lot of you, therefore I am hoping your knowledge will be exstensive in how much performance you'll get from it, beacause I imagine the first thing that comes after a stable clock speed would be a benchmark.
I've read somewhere that it's possible to take a 3800 X2 to 2.65, however I don't know if there would be any restrictions as far as the motherboard goes. I've read somewhere that the ASrock939-Dual SATA II has a voltage limit, and a frequency limit of 2.74, but I saw that someone had managed to take a proscessor, same as mine, to 2.5Ghz on that board.
I don't know much about my system, but I know I don't wanna be using my pc then all of a sudden my prosc melts from heavy usage, at full load both cores run about 50, according to core temp, and from what I've heard if I had the arctic cooler it'd run about 15-18 less. So if I overclock I'd wanna stay at stock voltage, and overclock purely to gain some extra performance.
I get bottlenecked quite a bit, I mean bioshock runs smoothly, average at 30 FPS. with full settings and DX10 maxxed. When I used XP it ran better, but no DX10. Medal of Honor Airborne ran pretty bad on XP, then I forced on all settings on GPU at nvidia control panel, and it ran smoother, on Vista it runs slightly worse...
So, with Crysis on the horizon, and I get the feeling my cpu let me down by that little bit on XP, and marginally more with Vista. I feel a performance increase is needed for Extra Stability. My card can easily max theese games, but my Prosc struggles.
So, I ask you, would the performance gain, overclocking from 2.0Ghz, to 2.5 make a reasonable, and noticable increase in performance to actually warrant halving the life of my CPU? I mean, would a 3800 clocked at 2.5Ghz, match the performance of a Proscessor running at 2.5 Stock?
I don't know how overclocking works, performance wise, I've read faqs, both here and on toms hardware. And my uncle knows what he's doing, but y'know I just wanna get some advice/opinions from people who've done it.