- Joined
- 9 Jul 2010
- Posts
- 22
lol i'll have a look at the BenQ then, aslong as its a propper 24" and not 23.75 or something daft i'll get that.
stulid,OCZ gold memory, according to ocuk shop staff, seem to have a higher than usual failure rate
It's not a problem as far as I know . . . I have not seen any evidence that backs up your point . . . your the one making the statement so the burden of proof lay with you? . . . where is your proof? . . . where is your evidence?its a very well founded commen as I proved with that link
Is that the problem? . . . are you suggesting that if someone buys the OCZ Gold DDR3 they will be DOA? . . . Is there a thread about this or is your entire arguement and scaremongering based on something that doesn't exist?why would someone working for ocuk, agree with a comment about how many dead ocz gold memory sticks turn up all to regularly
If the problem is clearly real do you think OcUK would sell the item? . . . . if the problem was clearly real do you think OcUK or a forum user would have made an official thread about it? . . . . if the problem was clearly real do you think I would suggest to people that they should buy OCZ gold DDR3the problem is clearly real, so deal with it, just because you don't have an issue with yours is great
You may not realise what you are doing but this is pure and simple Scaremongering . . . people building new systems and asking for help are jittery folk and your increasing their build costs £££ by scaring them off this affordable kit?I sure the OP would prefer to kill any potential issues by getting a ram kit that as far as im aware, haven't seen anyone moaning about it being DOA
Aye it does and should the person building their system feel that the lower timings are worth an extra £6.99 then let them buy it . . . but if they are working to a tight budget and feel like the OCZ gold fits the build then let them buy it, don't scare people offplus the reaper ram has better timings.
Pardon me SnowmanDev, I am trying to drum some sense into this new forum member who has taken it upon himself to preach falsehoods on OcUK forums . . . .seems like there is an underlying issue here![]()
Pardon me SnowmanDev, I am trying to drum some sense into this new forum member who has taken it upon himself to preach falsehoods on OcUK forums . . . .
The links you have posted do not exist . . . . I repeat they do not exist . . . you have posted nothing? . . . if you did it doesn't exist now?I have already posted links to the comments in that previous thread about ocz gold memory, why would a comment such as that be made i wonder? if there wasnt something wrong
stulid, I know you are new to debating but please don't take this discussion personally, I am totally impartial and only respond to logic, evidence and fact . . . what you need to understand is that when you (stulid) make a accusation on the interweb the burden of proof lay with you . . . and you alone . . . the latin for this is semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit which translates as "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges"Its also not hard to search the internet for other users complaining about OCZ gold memory
The link above essentially links directly to an american competitors customers reviews which shows some people have had problems with OCZ gold but the over-whelming majority of people have classed this memory as "Excellent" and according to the overall consensus the OCZ gold is "Good" . . . having a few users rant about hardware not working is either the hardware genuinely not working or they really don't know how to install and set-up memory correctly . . . . as said already a portion of computer hardware no matter what brand it is or how expensive it is will turn up either DOA or faulty, that is the nature of the beast and those that have been working with hardware for many years will know this is the truth . .
stulid, I have done nothing but be polite with you and ask you to be reasonable . . . in the time it has taken me to try and help you see sense I could have been helping a lot of other people, either with specs or with trouble-shooting or just some random Bang-for-Buck philosophy . . .also noticied some ocz gold hate in the memory forum,
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18162631
I'm not gonna accept that what someone said to someone who then said to someone else is in anyway more accurate or "Truthful" than my own first hand experience? . . . I have no idea who NathWrath is or what his technical level is or indeed what his function for OcUk is? . . . if there was a genuine problem I would expect to see an official post detailing the problem or in fact the product withdrawn from sale . . .
You made a statement that basically said don't buy the OCZ gold if you want an easy life? . . . I asked you to explain yourself and supply some proof? . . . you then linked me to a thread about the lack of 4GB modules in which the famous corsair representative "Yellowbeard" had posted, someone made a statement mocking OCZ, someone agreed . . .I provide the links you wanted in some other thread, you even commented on
stulid, I've been posting on these forums nearly seven years, I can honestly say I have no idea who NathWrath is? . . . I never saw his posts before and I have never interacted with him ever? . . . whatever he said was probably done is haste, could have been drunk? . . . the truth is whatever he said is not there now? . . . I didn't delete it did you?how you don't know who the ocuk employee nathwraith is, or his position in ocuk
One can say many silly things that they do not mean and later retract the statement and apologize . . . I don't see any Apology yet but I certainly see a retraction . . . why would this "mystical" guru figure of yours remove a statement he made? . . . if it was true and important why is it no longer there?so they must have been there for you to comment on! simple really
Of course you are scaremongering, the above statement stands as testament of this truth!theres no scaremongering here, just trying to save a potential pc builder, that may have low knowledge of pc components or fault finding, a lot of heartache
Your whole arguement is nothing more than a parrot fashion scaremongering campaign based on very little . . . there is no computer hardware we can recommend that is guaranteed to work . . . its computer hardware, it can be faulty . . . I will continue to recommend OCZ gold DDR3 and I will continue to help people in a reasonable and rational way and I urge you to not fly on and make wild assumptions and statements without supplying your burden of proof . . .you clearly don't enjoy a discussion as to why there are a lot of negative comments about the memory being DOA, on these forums and other forums.