I did indeed, I didn't realise it was you last time! I've been racking my brain all day to find something to compare it against, but it turns out it's rare to find anything large and of a standard size that most people have. I'll try and do it against a 2l bottle of something fizzy later![]()
Excellent, thanks! I did wonder what you could use as well but wasn't sure myself. A bottle was a good idea though. I have to say though looking at that 2xTC I'm not sure I'd trust such a heavy lens on just that!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
If you shoot me a message in trust I'll email a couple of full res samples, although bare in mind that the 300mm is on a D300, and the 600mm are on a D3.
Thanks, I shall send you an email shortly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
To me that sounds like a definite buy over rent, if you were to rent something like the 200-400 (which is a better lens, but for the record is a heavier and significantly larger lens than the 120-300) 3 times over you'd have paid for the 120-300 outright.
That is my feeling too, aside from the general going out and shooting things as well as long as I have the space whatever I choose will hopefully be useful over the next few years. I may still keep the 70-300 as a general muck around lens if I'm just taking the camera along for a ride.
I'm not sure which, the 300 f/4 is underrated in my view and the 300 f/2.8 is obviously fantastic, I think on a crop body I'd take one of those if I wasn't satisfied with the 70-300 and wanted more reach than the 70-200 (oh, and didn't fancy paying for the 200-400). On a full frame body I'd take a 400 or the 200-400. Obviously
I'm not convinced any zoom other than the 200-400 would be enough of an upgrade to be worth the money personally but I don't know the 120-300 at all.
I loved the Canon 300 f/4 and the Nikon is supposed to be just as good. I think they are underrated by many who immediately go for the f/2.8 versions, not realising how much easier an f/4 is to carry around, and just how sharp they are. Just a shame Nikon seem to have missed upgrading the current f/4 to VR...
I'm currently umming and arring about whether to pick one of the 120-300's up shortly but I know a new version is coming out soon, all I know is spring, with no official price... Higher or lower and when... Anyone want to guess...?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/504c0/504c01027866aa22f96a5f2d3e8b91463e55ad81" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"