Associate
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 1,355
- Location
- Cumbria, United Kingdom
Hi all, not really sure how to title this, but anyone clued up on the subject I'd appreciate the input.
I work as part of a 2 person team. When I started at the place I'm at, I started under one role, (a receptionist/admin) but I was transferred to a different department.
My colleague earns £11ph, I earn 8.13.
She has been there for a number of years, whether that makes a difference or not I'm unsure. But we both now have the same job title, same responsibilities, we are like for like, but I earn less.
8.13 was my starting wage in my previous position within the business, but I would have thought that now I am working in another department, my pay should be relevant to my colleagues.
I've put a letter explaining this into management, who said they will discuss it with the business partners. I'd just like to know where I'd stand if I get flat out refused, because I can't help but feel if the tables were turned and I, as a man, was doing the same job but earning more than a woman, that this would be a simple case of sexual discrimination.
Any thoughts? Preferably from those qualified, union reps or people knowledgeable on employment law.
Thanks in advance either way!
I work as part of a 2 person team. When I started at the place I'm at, I started under one role, (a receptionist/admin) but I was transferred to a different department.
My colleague earns £11ph, I earn 8.13.
She has been there for a number of years, whether that makes a difference or not I'm unsure. But we both now have the same job title, same responsibilities, we are like for like, but I earn less.
8.13 was my starting wage in my previous position within the business, but I would have thought that now I am working in another department, my pay should be relevant to my colleagues.
I've put a letter explaining this into management, who said they will discuss it with the business partners. I'd just like to know where I'd stand if I get flat out refused, because I can't help but feel if the tables were turned and I, as a man, was doing the same job but earning more than a woman, that this would be a simple case of sexual discrimination.
Any thoughts? Preferably from those qualified, union reps or people knowledgeable on employment law.
Thanks in advance either way!