Dennis Clarke: Man sentenced for one-punch killing of 82-year-old
Omar Moumeche, 18, killed Dennis Clarke after he challenged three teenagers about their behaviour.
www.bbc.co.uk
Too lenient imo.
I'm glad i'm not alone in thinking so. The mind boggles tbh.Absolutely too lenient.
I don't think the veteran matters.
These asbo collecting teens think (and tbh rightly) they can get away with anything.
Shop lifting, riding E-scooters with absolutely no care about anyone else, vandalism etc with little or no punishment... It needs sorting
No danger to public. Is that not a bit ironic after killing a pensioner'The judge said while Moumeche was a "young man prone to outbursts of anger", he did not present a risk to the public'.
Absolute ****.
We need to reintroduce some humiliation as punishment. I think that would have the most stigma in society these days.
Ok Dowie.
'The judge said while Moumeche was a "young man prone to outbursts of anger", he did not present a risk to the public'.
Absolute ****.
Eugenics is largely a load of nonsense in humans when it comes to behaviour as you have recessive genes (that can basically come forward many generations later and actually be useful in some ways*) and things like upbringing has a huge part to play and oddly enough many of the sorts of problems that result in the behavioural issues in later life happen regardless of class (and some could argue that the behaviour at some of the "upper class" schools encourages really problematic issues, just see the current crop in parliament who are batting above average for major lawbreaking and that's just what's come out publicly).No, the problem is a lack of control, many people are only human animals.
Humiliation does not solve that problem, only sterilization does, and only on the timescale of multiple generations.
Almost certainly a specific legal term, probably indicating he's not a career criminal or someone who plans to attack people.No danger to public. Is that not a bit ironic after killing a pensioner
Attack with a single punch, that likely for most people would not have been "serious".“The judge said while Moumeche was a "young man prone to outbursts of anger", he did not present a risk to the public.”
Attacks and kills a member of the public, not a risk to the public. The logic is strong with this one.
I was watching the channel 4 reality programme Banged Up: Celebrity edition.No, the problem is a lack of control, many people are only human animals.
Humiliation does not solve that problem, only sterilization does, and only on the timescale of multiple generations.
That seems to be a very common thing in a lot of places with high violence or murder rates.I was watching the channel 4 reality programme Banged Up: Celebrity edition.
Johnny Mercer was one of the guests. They had to stay for 7 days in prison with long term ex criminals.
One of the people he was talking to was saying he was jailed for beating a man to death. That he didn't go out to do that.
Mercer said he as had fights with people but stopped himself at a certain point because he realised his life would be over if he went to far and he values it to much. He asked the guy why he didn't have that self preservation thought? The guy replied because he didn't value his life at that time.
I thought it was an interesting comment, as I've always wondered why many young people today seem to have no self preservation instinct. I guess they don't see the future for themselves.