You do realize you can customize this to how ever the user likes don't you? Just drag the monitoring points around to suit the order you want...
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Is this my system or AC Unity?
- Thread starter r7slayer
- Start date
You do realize you can customize this to how ever the user likes don't you? Just drag the monitoring points around to suit the order you want...
Well for the people interested i've tested with Vsync off and while it seemed only very little noticeably smoother the usage and FPS remains the same. However i'm getting tearing here and there which is annoying. Vram usage is at 2583Mb so like i said in a previous post not touching no where near 4Gb
Everything is on high with SSAO on 1080p so i would be expecting more than 45 FPS running through the streets. I can't tell if my game is fully updated as i installed through uplay but i'm going to assume it is. So just guess ill have to accept its Direct x and game bottleneck.
edit - turning settings down actually decreases GPU usage, get around 60% on medium, high is mid 70 and very high/ultra seems to top out GPU usage. However FPS dosnt really increase much. I have a 1080p monitor with 120Hz refresh so i expect it to try and at least reach 120FPS
Everything is on high with SSAO on 1080p so i would be expecting more than 45 FPS running through the streets. I can't tell if my game is fully updated as i installed through uplay but i'm going to assume it is. So just guess ill have to accept its Direct x and game bottleneck.
edit - turning settings down actually decreases GPU usage, get around 60% on medium, high is mid 70 and very high/ultra seems to top out GPU usage. However FPS dosnt really increase much. I have a 1080p monitor with 120Hz refresh so i expect it to try and at least reach 120FPS
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 6,586
It's the game mate, i was playing on lowest settings with a 970@1440 and it was still unplayable. Nothing would increase the frames to feel smooth, in the end i uninstalled and ****ed off.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
Yes. I do but why would he keep everything else in the same place and only change them two around?
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,883
- Location
- Surrey
lol no that is usage, you really are a special instrument, Shanks.
The first readout is the power target.
Just for you:
The 290x performance is driver related. Even Kepler performance on this game is pretty terrible.
Or should I do it in the same place again?
lol.
The first readout is the power target.
Just for you:
The 290x performance is driver related. Even Kepler performance on this game is pretty terrible.
Or should I do it in the same place again?
lol.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
Fair enough.
Still doesn't explain the countless other users having poor gpu usage.
How is it running single gpu config?
Still doesn't explain the countless other users having poor gpu usage.
How is it running single gpu config?
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,883
- Location
- Surrey
98%
This game loves Maxwell, note I'm only getting 28 FPS though with 4X MSAA with one card. FXAA tops for single card users for maxing out other settings.
This game loves Maxwell, note I'm only getting 28 FPS though with 4X MSAA with one card. FXAA tops for single card users for maxing out other settings.