Does best impression of Castiel...
You implied he'd been sacked. He wasn't, you are wrong so stop making a fool of yourself.
I said it proved he had not been sacked based on the media and other debates where the implication was he has been sacked. This simply proves that the contracts are still valid and running until they expire.
Even though 'sacked' is common parlance in the entertainment world for not having your contract renewed and everyone, including me, understood the sentiment of your post, technically he wasn't sacked. You implied he was, so you are wrong.
I said it proived he was not sacked...not that there was any implication he was. of course if you wish to read my post in such a way, go ahead.
Did I mention you're technically wrong?
Why, was he sacked?
No, no, no. Let's not worry about the point you were making and how that isn't affected by whether he was sacked or not, let's start a two page debate how you implied he had been sacked when he wasn't.
If you want to debate whether he was sacked or not, go ahead. I'm sure others might debate it with you or not, as the case may be.
Although if you are attempting to be clever simply because you are butthurt over being wrong in aniother thread, then perhaps you might want to reconsider, as it may well be considered as breaching the rules of the forum..i'm not sure..but if you think you have a valid point on Jeremy being sacked rather than not, make your case...someone might entertain you.
...annoying isn't it?
No, actually watching you make a fool of yourself is rather amusing.