Is this true?

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 13:10

I was wondering if this is true as I saw it on this board?

Is most PC Games ported over from consoles meaning we don't get as good of a experience if it was specifically developed for the pc hardware?

Whats your opinion on this and would you like to see a different approach?

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 13:31

I am not trolling but simply want better titles for the pc as Crysis is probably the best graphical looking and its 3 years old!

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 13:39

Devrij said:
you and me both brother. As has been said already, we're all waiting for next gen of consoles to free up devs to push existing boundaries and utilise the resources PCs already have.

but surely there is a big enough market to develop pc games earlier than next gen consoles as we currently got the hardware for it..

I don't think the pc should be the shadow of the consoles :confused:

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 14:13

lol I am seriously just interested and I think we shouldn't wait on other technology just to get good titiles.

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 14:36

I am not trolling like I said i'm just interested as I noticed someone mention it in the thread about ps3 graphics

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 15:54

paulc25 said:
Perhaps you should put all of your questions into a single thread...

lol I got a lot of questions

coughs · 19 Aug 2010 at 16:59

and it seems I'm not the only one who thinks this:

RobRX-7 said:
I wouldn't say it's doing fine. If it was doing fine, we would have loads of game devs pushing the boundaries in graphics. At the moment we have nothing more than ports with a bit of AA. The tech is there, the devs are not.

Pc gaming needs a kick up the arse imo. The only exclusive games it gets is the typical RTS