But there was that level of improvement, it just wasn't this past decade as you said.
1993, intel with the pentium at 66 MHz,
2003, amd with the fx-51. 2.2 Ghz or intel with the p4 extreme at around 3 GHz iirc.
Just randomly picked these from a list, but willing to wager that's close to x100 improvement in compute power in 10 years.
The improvements in ARM processors have been very impressive but there's no reason to believe it will not stagnate much like x86 or indeed many other forms of technology after they experience rapid growth cycles.
Please follow the context of the discussion, I was responding to a user who was claiming that their 10-year-old x86 chip is still very capable while their 10-year-old ARM chip wasn't. I explained the reason.
Now about what you said, I never really claimed otherwise and I don't disagree. I'm pretty sure the ARM improvements will slow down as well. But the thing is, 10 years ago x86 was orders of magnitude ahead of ARM when it came to performance. It's not like that anymore. The gap has pretty much disappeared and there is competition now.
Who will have the fastest core in 5 years? 5 years ago the answer to that was obvious. Right now it's "I don't know" and that's all I'm saying.
I suppose it depends how you look at it. How much faster is an EPYC.2 system over an Opteron?
I'm pretty sure a lot faster. Mostly due to SSDs and other technologies. The IPC improvement across those 10 years have not been impressive (75-80%).
That's what happens when there's no competition and Intel sits on their ass doing nothing for more than 5 years, and AMD is being treated like some kind of paragon of progress for just showing up to work. It's great that AMD is back, but no need to oversell it, the x86 scene over the last 10 years has been abysmal. It might get better now that there's competition both between Intel and AMD, and from ARM, I certainly hope so.