![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
But in the real world, the Porsche would be far superior.
It is wrong...
- Thread starter Azza
- Start date
But in the real world, the Porsche would be far superior.
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 10,655
The porsche would be more fun doing 150 on a country road and being able to brake and not die if you crash it.
That's the point. In the MG you don't have to be doing 150MPH to enjoy it.
BUT. That has nothing to do with which is more attractive.
it does if he finds the fact he can have fun easier attractive
anyway can we send OP to a mental home ?
Well that's a matter of personal opinion. I'd still say the MG is more attractive and I can imagine hours of fun with the top down and summer hooning on country roads.
The Porsche im sure is a fnatastic machine. But, I have never really liked the look of Porsches and they all look the same.
Queue a hoard of people saying "OMG porsche hata, what do you drive,olol?" as if the car I currently drive has any bearing on my opinion of super cars.
Also: I'd note that the thread was started talking about asthetics, then everyone satrted going on about unreliability and rust on the MG. So I'm not really the one you should call out for not talking about the cars' attractiveness.
Honest question.. Was that a real or a shopped picture?
blatantly shopped
i can't remember what the real one was, i think it was something in german that was equally easy