It's not gay, it's a woman's penis!

I'm sick of this "phobia" nonsense.

I'm not afraid of a guy who wants to be a woman.

I'm not afraid of Chinese people because I don't like their government. (This is literally a thing, I wish I was joking)

I'm not afraid of Muslims because I don't like religious ideology.

We live in a very odd and terrifying age.

I don't have a "phobia" but I do have opinions, and those opinions are built upon my experiences. It feels like my experiences are being pushed out in favor of irrational calls favoring "phobic" nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Dis86 said:
Stop being transphobic.

Said hurfdurf
Click to expand...

I've barely posted in years yet I'm still one of the most talked about forum users!

This kind of thing sets back genuine trans issues, and its clearly a publicity stunt manufacturing fake outrage by a trans woman who is trying to shill her onlyfans that most idiots posting in this thread have fallen for. Good job guys!
 
I have no issues as people are just people. I hate campness though - its not normal behaviour statistically. I can bear it for a minute (when its funny) then its just annoying.

The focus is campness, not orientation - there are camp straight people, but more non-straight
 
morbid42 said:
I have no issues as people are just people. I hate campness though - its not normal behaviour statistically. I can bear it for a minute (when its funny) then its just annoying.

The focus is campness, not orientation - there are camp straight people, but more non-straight
Click to expand...
I find gangster/rude boi or 'WAAHEEEY' lad types way more annoying than campness :p
 
Gray2233 said:
I'm sick of this "phobia" nonsense.

I'm not afraid of a guy who wants to be a woman.

I'm not afraid of Chinese people because I don't like their government. (This is literally a thing, I wish I was joking)

I'm not afraid of Muslims because I don't like religious ideology.

We live in a very odd and terrifying age.

I don't have a "phobia" but I do have opinions, and those opinions are built upon my experiences. It feels like my experiences are being pushed out in favor of irrational calls favoring "phobic" nonsense.
Click to expand...

It's because by referring back to your own knowledge and experiences you're discriminating in the eyes of the modern left, they want to everyone to act like nursery schoolers who have never learned anything. It's like stop and search being banned for being discriminatory even though the discrimination is based on evidence and it has already proven to effective in fighting crime. I have sympathy for innocent ethnic people being targetted by it but it is for the greater good really, once the scourge of knife carrying declines among that demographic the practice of stopping and searching will become less common and streets safer as a result. But instead, we have to ban it and you end up with daily reports of kids dying in stabbings.

I've posted it before but this video is a fascinating insight into the sort of mentality at play:
 
Welp, just got CC'ed in on an email from one of the suppliers I've worked with. Apparently they are not allowed to list their products within the NHS as "mens" or "ladies" style (already colour neutral) because a man might not have a tackle or a lady might. The product needs to fit close to the skin (in contact with) to be effective so they're having to re-brand as "avec winky" and "sans winky" to not offend. The label of the patient seems far more important than treating the patient for their long term condition.
 
Steeps said:
Welp, just got CC'ed in on an email from one of the suppliers I've worked with. Apparently they are not allowed to list their products within the NHS as "mens" or "ladies" style (already colour neutral) because a man might not have a tackle or a lady might. The product needs to fit close to the skin (in contact with) to be effective so they're having to re-brand as "avec winky" and "sans winky" to not offend. The label of the patient seems far more important than treating the patient for their long term condition.
Click to expand...

That just seems so ridiculous...

Like a regular/biological woman often wouldn't have an issue buying "mens" products - plenty of girls like "mens" razors (cheaper), will buy(or steal) a "boyfriend" t-shirt to wear in bed, will perhaps wear mens watches (actress Helen Mirren is quite into her watches apparently and buys mens ones) etc...

Why is is such a big deal for say a trans-man to buy "women hygiene products" - they might have gender dysphoria but they don't need to be treated with kid gloves, they know full well they've got woman bits etc.. it isn't something we should bend over backwards to avoid highlighting or reminding them of and we don't need to cater to any decisions by pretending otherwise.
 
Virtue signalling > health.

It will probably end when someone ends up dead from being given the wrong dose of something.
 
Last edited:
Steeps said:
Welp, just got CC'ed in on an email from one of the suppliers I've worked with. Apparently they are not allowed to list their products within the NHS as "mens" or "ladies" style (already colour neutral) because a man might not have a tackle or a lady might. The product needs to fit close to the skin (in contact with) to be effective so they're having to re-brand as "avec winky" and "sans winky" to not offend. The label of the patient seems far more important than treating the patient for their long term condition.
Click to expand...

That's funny xD

I guess it does avoid any possible problems, either you have a knob or you dont.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom