Why not just rip straight to Apple lossless rather than rip to WAV first?
No way - the optimal SQ/filesize ratio would be with a lower bitrate!If you want the best sound quality for the size of the file: AAC (@ 320Kbps)
"XLD" is a newly minted EAC equivalent for OS X. I'm glad to not have to use EAC any more. It delivers the results, but it's a pig of an application.1) Use EAC to rip the tracks to .WAV (Which makes sure the tracks are 100% accurate)
2) Import the .WAVs into iTunes and recode to Apple Lossless
3) Delete .WAVs from library and PC
4) Tag the tracks (Artist, album artist, album, year of album, track number of how many, cd number of how many, genre, track composers from the cd booklet, album artwork from iTunes or scanned in if it's not available digitally)
=
The perfect iTunes library.
Error correction isn't the same as accurately ripping the disc.iTunes has error correction built in:
Although I know some people are super paranoid (and thus super push EAC) about the CD ripping process. I mean that for new discs you just buy, rip and put up on a shelf. Of course if they've actually been used somewhat and have scratches etc. then something like EAC is definitely good.
Probably ~4x the sizeDoes having them lossless mean the filesize is a lot larger than say AAC?
Does having them lossless mean the filesize is a lot larger than say AAC?
I use ALAC here
Yeah, lossless is large, very roughly around 30mb for an average 4min track.
If you want absolute compatibility with the best sound quality: MP3 @ 320Kbps
If you want the best sound quality for the size of the file: AAC (@ 320Kbps)
If you want the best sound quality: WAV
Take your pick![]()