Who wants 14nm skylake when you can have 10 nm skymont ?
![]()
10nm is sooo 2016. 1nm is where things will really get interesting!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Who wants 14nm skylake when you can have 10 nm skymont ?
![]()
Sandy won't be 'outdated' for at least another couple of years by any reasoned standard, looks to be the Q6600 of current times.
Yeah I agree. I'm on a Q6600 @ 3.8ghz and don't really need to upgrade.
I've got the itch to upgrade though because it's been so long since I built this comp so Ivybridge will probably be my next.
10nm is sooo 2016. 1nm is where things will really get interesting!
how did you achieve 3.8?!?
Sillicon processors will most likely not be used beyond 8 nm die shrink (although that value has been getting lower and lower with years but the physical limits are still there).
how did you achieve 3.8?!?
So basically Intel aren't happy with the huge volumes of unsold Sandybridge processors and are stalling the Ivybridge launch so more of the old technology can be shifted onto unsuspecting customers who don't know any better.
I wouldn't bother waiting for Ivy just go with SB and a decent Z68 mobo. You can always sell the SB at a later date once the Ivy reviews are in![]()
Low quantity, high demand for the small shipment and the fact it wipes the floor with Bulldozer... What can we expect to see as the price point for the first few IB chips that get sold.
So basically Intel aren't happy with the huge volumes of unsold Sandybridge processors and are stalling the Ivybridge launch so more of the old technology can be shifted onto unsuspecting customers who don't know any better.