just ordered a PS3 , will i still go to heaven??

JBeck said:
I know you like to disagree with everything I say, but try not to repeat what someone already said over two hours before you...
I read from the top down my friend, your post was obviously before theirs. It was such a glaring error I had to post.

You also make it sound like I have an agenda against you, I don't, I don't have agenda's against anyone I merely post as I see fit.
 
spudstudios said:
Welcome to the world of..
" where's the rumble?"
"Why can't I put wallpaper on the bg?"
"Where's my headset?"
"Why is no one talking in online games?"
"Where's the decent marketplace?"
"Why do my games come out a year later than 360?"
"Why are all my best games my PS2 games?"

And finally
" wow... blue ray is awesome"

Be interesting to see how the 2 consoles compare for you.
enjoy the movies.

LOL! Clearly youre really poor and finding it really difficult to justify your 360, just sell it and feed the kids. ;)
 
Kreeeee said:
Why give 360 owners a bad rep on here, eh?

Sorry. I do actually own both consoles. So my opinion is valid.
Sorry if you PS3 fan boys can't handle the truth.. It really is a shoddy rushed panic of a console. Waiting a year for anything to happen in just not good enough.

Sony got the psp spot on but with PS3 they really let all PS fans down.
Filed under - "almost, but could have done better"

I mean sheesh they even forgot to put the e on the end of Blue ( the laser colour if I am not mistaken).

I am glad so many of you felt the need to rejustify all of my points with useless answers. £40 pa is not a lot of money when you take the product into account. At least MS have the resources, will and money to provide their customers with a good service.
 
spudstudios said:
I am glad so many of you felt the need to rejustify all of my points with useless answers. £40 pa is not a lot of money when you take the product into account. At least MS have the resources, will and money to provide their customers with a good service.
At least Sony offer dedicated hosting to their multiplayer games for FREE.
 
NokkonWud said:
At least Sony offer dedicated hosting to their multiplayer games for FREE.


Knock on Wood - yep..WOOD..nowt else in there.

I will now give up and kill myself, as clearly my efforts to be the most pointless poster on these boards are in vain. ;)
 
Stanners said:
Rushed console, PS3 !! er as good as it is i would closer to your 360 for a rushed console.
Nope, I do believe that the PS3 was rushed out because Sony realised they couldn't leave a 2 year gap for the software to be released whilst at the same time delivering hardware that isn't really anymore powerful than the Xbox360.

The Xbox360 was released at exactly the right time and has had consistent cycles of high quality games around April and August since its launch, a good launch lineup and some good games released in between.

Sony still haven't gotten those key games out yet, despite what will be a 2 year differential between Xbox360 launch and major titles for the PS3.

To state the Xbox360 was 'rushed' is wrong.
 
I was not talking about software, i am talking about the hardware. You know, the small issue of the RoD and reliability issues. In my eyes it was rushed out without the proper performance testing and such forth.
 
It wasn't 'rushed' out though, it didn't have to rush out as there was zero competition. It was however put out with a bad design. This would have still been the issue later on in its life (as has become apparent as new ones still die).
 
NokkonWud said:
It wasn't 'rushed' out though, it didn't have to rush out as there was zero competition. It was however put out with a bad design. This would have still been the issue later on in its life (as has become apparent as new ones still die).
I agree. They had great timing and read the market well. Shame their product testing team let them down but it was definitely not rushed. People who constantly claim it's rushed are yet another example of people letting others do the thinking for them.
 
How do we know it was not rushed out, Do you have proof of this or is it your personal point of view. I stand by what i said, they rushed it out to get a good lead on the competition without testing it correctly. If they did not rush it out then this is even worse in my eyes as they knowingly did not test it correctly or ignored the fact they over heat, i am currently on my thirs and find it disgusting that it was released in its current state. I will leave it here as i am starting to sound like some sort of fan boy which i are`nt as i enjoy all my three consoles and have no loyality to any. :)
 
Kreeeee said:
I agree. They had great timing and read the market well. Shame their product testing team let them down but it was definitely not rushed. People who constantly claim it's rushed are yet another example of people letting others do the thinking for them.

Why am i letting others do the thinking for me, thats just an easy answer, please expand more on this notion of yours
 
Stanners said:
Why am i letting others do the thinking for me, thats just an easy answer, please expand more on this notion of yours
The bandwagon effect that is very prolific on here.

Don't make the mistake of assuming my comment was directly aimed at you.
 
Ah right :)

Yeah i agree with what you said there. These are just my thoughts nothing else, not based on anything apart from what i have seen and gone through myself. Anyway i shall leave it there :)
 
Stanners said:
Ah right :)

Yeah i agree with what you said there. These are just my thoughts nothing else, not based on anything apart from what i have seen and gone through myself. Anyway i shall leave it there :)
Like I said in another thread half my brain is asleep today so sorry if I came across a bit squiffy :)
 
"Why are all my best games my PS2 games?"

JBeck said:
Because you're weird?

How is it weird? The PS3 lacks titles at the moment, fact.

Only decent exclusives are RFOM (Well, I hated RFOM awful campaign, story and AI) and Motorstorm, oh yeah NG:Sigma if you ain't played the Xbox version.
 
NokkonWud said:
I read from the top down my friend, your post was obviously before theirs. It was such a glaring error I had to post.

You also make it sound like I have an agenda against you, I don't, I don't have agenda's against anyone I merely post as I see fit.
Fair enough :)
 
Back
Top Bottom