Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Well, yeah...Until you realise a 3080 was 15% faster than a $2500 Titan RTX and went for £650 with a game included.
If they could only offer the same Nvidia does...Its likely going to end that way anyway if 80+% people buy nvidia each cycle they upgrade.
..then my nGreedia card would be cheaper? Right?
Hallock was in the CPU division, not GPU.Well AMD apparently wants to ripoff people who want to buy their products too. So it seems AMD really wants us to get one of their lower margin consoles instead. So if you get a console,that means you don't need one of their new Zen4/Zen5 CPUs too,when they are struggling to sell CPUs too.
They learnt nothing from Zen where they took two generations of beating Intel in price/performance and features to build the momentum for Zen3. They even priced their server and commercial products lower.
Consumer dGPUs - LeTs MaTcH nViDiA iN pRiCe.
Oh noes! Its not working. Lets repeat it again and make the RX7700XT replacement an RX7800XT.
If this was ATI I would have some faith they would hammer an RTX4070. But this is the same company which published fantasy rasterised performance figures for the RX7900 series.
No wonder Robert Hallock left.
Hallock was in the CPU division, not GPU.
The reason why AMD did well against Intel was because Intel messed up. They were years behind on their latest process node, and still had the IPC lead for many gens. If Intel was on track, it would have been a very different last 5 years. Nvidia is not really messing up at the moment.
Well AMD apparently wants to ripoff people who want to buy their products too. So it seems AMD really wants us to get one of their lower margin consoles instead. So if you get a console,that means you don't need one of their new Zen4/Zen5 CPUs too,when they are struggling to sell CPUs too.
Just checking you aren't pigeon holing me into the must be an AMD fanboy because I give nvidia a lot of ****.AMD are not better, they are another vendor or should I say pretty much the only other vendor in the space so I don't really have much faith in the duopoly. Generally in nvidia threads I try to refrain from discussing the other brand (like this thread). The whataboutisms are equally as tiring as the circular points in most of these threads.
![]()
Seems like AMD are re spinning rDNA 3, it just means that won't have a GPU above the current offerings.
They've done crap like this before but only because they had nothing but right now it's obviously a case of, if we can't over charge no new GPU for you.
I wouldn't care if it's red or green, but I do care to have the best performance, features and price...then my nGreedia card would be cheaper? Right?
Intel also got complacence when they sat back on their 4 cores are enough laurels.The reason why AMD did well against Intel was because Intel messed up. They were years behind on their latest process node, and still had the IPC lead for many gens. If Intel was on track, it would have been a very different last 5 years. Nvidia is not really messing up at the moment.
I doubt that's true but if it was that would hilarious in a bad way, basically a return to the rx 480/580 where amd was making low end and entry mid range GPUs only
Probably the happiest the AMD GPU team was in years and since, low cost card, low R&D cost, people liked it, they sold very well.
AMD didn't have to contend with any "AMD aren't doing enough to make my Nvidia cheaper" nonsense.