Just wrong tbh...

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 14:37

WARHURYEAH said:
But it is also only a 10 week old puppy, hence it running off being a curious pup that it is, having a puppy that young off a leash and running around is asking for trouble, however, it getting kicked in the head by some scummy chav should not happen.

Yea, i wouldn't expect that to happen anywhere.

[TFU] Thegoon84 · 30 Oct 2009 at 14:39

Man this stuff really upsets me, how can you stamp on a poor little defenceless puppy!

Worst thing is nothing will ever come of this, true justice should be and eye for eye....

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 14:43

Thegoon84 said:
Man this stuff really upsets me, how can you stamp on a poor little defenceless puppy!

Worst thing is nothing will ever come of this, true justice should be and eye for eye....

what do you mean an eye for an eye?

As in kill the person who killed the puppy?

(sorry a little confused)

krooton · 30 Oct 2009 at 14:54

wackydude1234 said:
what do you mean an eye for an eye?

As in kill the person who killed the puppy?

(sorry a little confused)

No, get the thug a puppy, and kill that, obviously

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 15:02

krooton said:
No, get the thug a puppy, and kill that, obviously

Huh? that would be horrible :S

Dave M · 30 Oct 2009 at 15:16

wackydude1234 said:
she didn't need a leash since she was carrying it but she put it down for a second while she tucked her trouser leg in.

Why was she carrying it round the park?

DampCat · 30 Oct 2009 at 16:46

She's a 15 year old girl. They like to carry little dogs. That is not a crime and does not mean the dog deserves to be booted to death in any capacity.

That it wasn't on a lead is completely irrelevent, I suspect the scrote would still have kicked it if she was walking past and it was on a lead.

There's no justification for this, and using a lack of leash as some kind of excuse is extremely unjust towards a child who was doing little more than enjoying playing with her new pet in what should have been a perfectly safe environment.

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 17:27

DampCat said:
She's a 15 year old girl. They like to carry little dogs. That is not a crime and does not mean the dog deserves to be booted to death in any capacity.

That it wasn't on a lead is completely irrelevent, I suspect the scrote would still have kicked it if she was walking past and it was on a lead.

There's no justification for this, and using a lack of leash as some kind of excuse is extremely unjust towards a child who was doing little more than enjoying playing with her new pet in what should have been a perfectly safe environment.

Thank you.

eggcup · 30 Oct 2009 at 17:30

wackydude1234 said:
what do you mean an eye for an eye?

As in kill the person who killed the puppy?

(sorry a little confused)

nooo killing the person is wrong, but kicking him in the head sounds like fair game to me!

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 17:42

eggcup said:
nooo killing the person is wrong, but kicking him in the head sounds like fair game to me!

Well yes killing the person is wrong, i was just confused by his post lol.

kicking him in the head would be bad too though. i'm not sure what punishment i would give him =/

Tefal · 30 Oct 2009 at 17:45

wackydude1234 said:
i'm not sure what punishment i would give him =/

lock him in a room with Tank tbh

steve-h · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:36

ive come the conclusion I cannot stand papers

GREAT PAIN, DIED INSTANTLY ??

SUFFERING from adhd?? what?

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:47

steve-h said:
ive come the conclusion I cannot stand papers

GREAT PAIN, DIED INSTANTLY ??

SUFFERING from adhd?? what?

it died within 5 minutes, not instantly. and yes my sister suffers from ADHD.

TurnipHead · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:51

I hope they capture the chav that did this and kick him in the shin. Scummy little rat.

[TW]Fox · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:51

I dont understand why the ADHD thing keeps getting mentioned. Surely any ailments the owner is suffering from is unrelated to the fate that befal the poor puppy :confused:

Are we suggesting it would have been less serious if the puppy was killed and she didn't have ADHD :confused:

Biohazard · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:53

[TW]Fox;15212084 said:
I dont understand why the ADHD thing keeps getting mentioned.

Me neither.

^TANK^ · 30 Oct 2009 at 18:56

TurnipHead said:
I hope they capture the chav that did this and kick him in the shin. Scummy little rat.

In the shin :confused:

, I imagined a club hammer to both hands and feet would be the most suitable punishment.

wackydude1234 · 30 Oct 2009 at 19:11

[TW]Fox;15212084 said:
I dont understand why the ADHD thing keeps getting mentioned. Surely any ailments the owner is suffering from is unrelated to the fate that befal the poor puppy

Are we suggesting it would have been less serious if the puppy was killed and she didn't have ADHD

it could possibly have been a targeted attack, hence why ADHD was mentioned, also ADHD was mentioned because her mental age is less than her real age which makes this incident worse. imagine a.. let's say 8-10 year old witnessing their puppy being stamped on.. also the reason we got the puppy was to help her cope with her ADHD

WARHURYEAH · 30 Oct 2009 at 19:43

wackydude1234 said:
also the reason we got the puppy was to help her cope with her ADHD

Wait...what?

Explain!

[TW]Fox · 30 Oct 2009 at 19:49

Do we actually know without a doubt the dog was willfully and deliberately stamped on?

Is there no chance at all that the dog ran towards some chav who attempted to shoe it away with his foot, and of course it being such a young dog, any contact resulted in massive injury?

Maybe I am giving chav morons too much credit but I find it hard to beleive even the sickest of chavs could willfully and deliberately stamp on the head of a puppy.

Is there NO chance this was a bad accident? Were there any independant witnesses?