KFC noob advice

spoffle said:
A 12 piece boneless box to feed 5 people? Wat? I can do 16 piece ones by myself.



KFC isn't particularly cheap, and boneless boxes aren't *that* big.

You shouldn't use your own eating habits to criticise others.

What you've described is basically a snack.
Click to expand...

If that's a snack then god knows what you consider a main meal.

Always makes me laugh when people pop up in these threads showing off (If you can call it that, it's gluttony) that they can eat so much. Well done.
 
I made the bad decision of buying a 6 piece bargin bucket and almost died eating it. I just managed all the chicken and ate a few fries but that was it.
 
IndigoGorilla said:
If that's a snack then god knows what you consider a main meal.

Always makes me laugh when people pop up in these threads showing off (If you can call it that, it's gluttony) that they can eat so much. Well done.
Click to expand...

It makes me laugh when people can't understand that not everyone is their size, and thus doesn't eat as little as they do.

Lazder said:
Well done, now you are obese and going to die of heart attack.

Good on you.
Click to expand...

Why am I obese, and why am I going to die of a heart attack?
 
spoffle said:
It makes me laugh when people can't understand that not everyone is their size, and thus doesn't eat as little as they do.



Why am I obese, and why am I going to die of a heart attack?
Click to expand...

I do understand, my point still stands though as other than genetics having an effect your as big as you are because of how much you eat usually.

People constantly eating too much is just stupid on so many levels.
 
IndigoGorilla said:
I do understand, my point still stands though as other than genetics having an effect you're as big as you are because of how much you eat usually.
Click to expand...

"Big" is extremely vague. Some people are big, as in tall but have low muscle mass as well as body fat.

Some people are big as in high muscle mass, without being tall, with low body fat.

Some people are big with high muscle mass and high/medium body fat.

Each of these people will require a lot more calories than a person half their mass.

People constantly eating too much is just stupid on so many levels.
Click to expand...

The issue is that you're basing too much on your own eating habits. It doesn't work that way.
 
spoffle said:
KFC isn't particularly cheap, and boneless boxes aren't *that* big.

You shouldn't use your own eating habits to criticise others.

What you've described is basically a snack.
Click to expand...

OK let's check out RDAs and see if my £6.50 spend which I can get two meals out of is closer to it that your £20 spend shall we?

Even the biggest family bucket (18 pieces and 4 fries) is is less than that (£16), so are you saying the "family" in the title in that descriptor is inaccurate and is actually for one person?

Lazder said:
I guess you`d rather eat out of garbage bin given the chance.
Click to expand...

If KFC was the same standard of rotting food in a bin do you really think they would be successful?
 
estebanrey said:
OK let's check out RDAs and see if my £6.50 spend which I can get two meals out of is closer to it that your £20 spend shall we?

Even the biggest family bucket (18 pieces and 4 fries) is is less than that (£16), so are you saying the "family" in the title in that descriptor is inaccurate and is actually for one person?
Click to expand...

Are RDAs gospel? Do they solidly apply to everyone? They are extremely general and are based solely on calories, not actual mass.

You must eat very little if you can split a £6.50 meal from KFC in to two.
 
Hell yeah lets go full retard and turn this into a nutrition sports science thread, its been a few days..!!! yeeehaw!
 
spoffle said:
Are RDAs gospel? Do they solidly apply to everyone? They are extremely general and are based solely on calories, not actual mass.
Click to expand...

They are general sure, but unless you are 10 foot tall and have an over-active metabolism issue then they are fairly accurate. They certainly aren't that vague that you can jump from a £5 spend to a £20 one just based on body type.

spoffle said:
You must eat very little if you can split a £6.50 meal from KFC in to two.
Click to expand...

Or, I eat the normal amount and you are over eating. I'd be happy to go to any dietitian in the world and state how I do it..i.e....

estebanrey said:
3 pieces variety meal....

* 1 Piece, mini-fillet, two hot wings and half the large chips
* 2 Pieces and the rest of the chips
Click to expand...

...that each of those meals are fairly normal sized ones. I might ass a side of beans if I'm really peckish.

Tell me, do you get confused when you go shopping for plates. I'd assume in your world you don't understand why they are only around 10 inches in diameter.
 
Spoffle,

Pointing out bad grammar, being pedantic of my use of the word big (ok, we'll go for fat instead to make it simple for you) and trying to deviate away from the fact it's too much food for anyone on a constant basis doesn't make it a non-issue.

I know you'll spout some other rubbish shortly to justify it to yourself, go ahead, it's not my problem anyway.
 
spoffle, are you what most people would call a fatty? You really are overly protesting about your frankly astonishing need to eat a-typical portion sizes. This line of demonstration is often taken by fat people.
 
estebanrey said:
They are general sure, but unless you are 10 foot tall and have an over-active metabolism issue then they are fairly accurate. They certainly aren't that vague that you can jump from a £5 spend to a £20 one just based on body type.
Click to expand...

No it's not actually. There's quite a large difference between people. A person who is 8 stone will eat a lot less than a person who 12 stone, and the same goes for a person who is 16 stone.

So no they are not fairly accurate at all.



Or, I eat the normal amount and you are over eating. I'd be happy to go to any dietitian in the world and state how I do it..i.e....
Click to expand...

There's no such thing as "the normal amount". Any dietician who knows what they're talking about can easily acknowledge that people of different weights will eat largely proportionally different amounts.



...that each of those meals are fairly normal sized ones. I might ass a side of beans if I'm really peckish.
Click to expand...
As above, "normal" doesn't really exist in this context.

Tell me, do you get confused when you go shopping for plates. I'd assume in your world you don't understand why they are only around 10 inches in diameter.
Click to expand...

Your KFC meal would barely fill half a 10" plate...

IndigoGorilla said:
Spoffle,

Pointing out bad grammar, being pedantic of my use of the word big (ok, we'll go for fat instead to make it simple for you) and trying to deviate away from the fact it's too much food for anyone on a constant basis doesn't make it a non-issue.
Click to expand...

I didn't mention your grammar, and I wasn't being pedantic over the word big. I pointed out that it's a vague way of describing something. There are many ways of being big. The bottom line though is that "big" people eat more. If person A is twice the weight of person B, is it reasonable to expect person B to eat the same amount as person A? No.

I know you'll spout some other rubbish shortly to justify it to yourself, go ahead, it's not my problem anyway.
Click to expand...

Or maybe I'm pointing out that your posts were inaccurate. It's no different to acknowledging that adults eat more than children general due to a difference of mass.

[FnG]magnolia;25046684 said:
spoffle, are you what most people would call a fatty? You really are overly protesting about your frankly astonishing need to eat a-typical portion sizes. This line of demonstration is often taken by fat people.
Click to expand...

Sure, correcting incorrect information is done as a sort of justification response, there is never any other reason to do so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom