• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Killer Instinct DX12 benchmarks

Mtom

Mtom

Mtom

Associate
Joined
4 Nov 2013
Posts
1,437
Location
Oxfordshire
Gamegpu.com made a nice test: http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/killer-instinct-test-gpu

Wzie9tB.jpg


jUmpWt3.jpg


jQNZ9K1.jpg


Qgxxz7h.jpg


At the first moment when i just seen the green and red lines i was "NV doing well".... then i read the card names and i was " WTF?" :)
 
Last edited:
Thing is it seems that MS is doing what was envisioned a long time ago, that they can just pull the console games to pc fast with their already implemented GCN optimization, and they don't really care about other optimizations.
That makes some questionable quality ports, but also looks like very-very bad news for NV.
 
Last edited:
Dave2150 said:
Comparing the latest NVIDIA cards to 2013 AMD cards? What a pointless article.
Click to expand...

Why is it pointless? From looking at the bench we can tell the latest Amd cards would destroy Nvidia's equal offerings. Jeeze guys if you have anything thats older than two years dont bother benching because its pointless comparing to anything new.
 
Dave2150 said:
Comparing the latest NVIDIA cards to 2013 AMD cards? What a pointless article.
Click to expand...

Not if you're a 290X owner, it's not. LOL :p

Probably the only issue they had with the Fury was that it sat too far ahead against the 980Ti, so they casually forgot to put it in. :D

Can anyone see a trend in DX12 benchmarks starting to form?

Saying that, it is ONLY 3 or 4 DX12 benchmarks and we do need more to prove this trend and the fact that it's probably an alpha/beta and not the full release so we shouldn't judge it yet.
;)
 
Can someone please explain why the 380X is below both the 970's in the 4K graph as its clearly 3 fps faster. :eek:

Blimey, now the 380X is beating the 970....it'll be the 270X next. :p
 
andybird123 said:
If they actually worked at all
Click to expand...

Andybird, I know you luvs your Nvidia card(s) but come on...that was poor, even by your standards.

My Fury Tri-X has been rock solid from the get go and I am very pleased with it. Great solid performer.

The grapes are green, but very sour and in extremely poor taste. :)
 
maonayze said:
Can someone please explain why the 380X is below both the 970's in the 4K graph as its clearly 3 fps faster. :eek:

Blimey, now the 380X is beating the 970....it'll be the 270X next. :p
Click to expand...

They list them based on minimums, probably a case that without rounding the 970 had say 39.4 where the 380x had 39.2 or something.
 
Mtom said:
Thing is it seems that MS is doing what was envisioned a long time ago, that they can just pull the console games to pc fast with their already implemented GCN optimization, and they don't really care about other optimizations.
That makes some questionable quality ports, but also looks like very-very bad news for NV.
Click to expand...

Can you remember all the people saying AMD having the console sweep meant entirely nothing for PC gaming, that Nvidia didn't even care about consoles because they were completely unimportant.

However I'm not entirely sure I agree on the no other optimisations. What I think it means is Nvidia can't exert as much pressure on a dev to make a game that doesn't work well on AMD as fundamentally the engine is designed to work well on GCN architecture. So while whatever crap Ubisoft is making today has Nvidia in their ear from day one, anything coming from console or even more the case on Xbox One, is specifically geared to a GCN type architecture to begin with meaning AMD is getting great optimisation.

Because there are also several PC only DX12 titles that are running better on AMD, it's not like they don't work or don't work well on Nvidia architecture, it's that AMD cards are being better utilised than they were previously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom