Leaving PC ON during lightning?

Essentially anyone who lives in the likes of an apartment block has no hope in hell of achieving the 3m rule you suggest to an earth rod in the ground.

As most electrical supplies are buried underground surely in reality the risk is quite small with the exception of those who live in rural communities in which case the risk is greater as most power transmission is overhead.

POTS is hardily a concern these days as who uses dial-up anyway?
 
Maybe just unlucky but got home last night and my virgin media box and one of my network switches were fried (both ok before I went to work), a neighbour said one of the houses in the row was struck by lightning so wandering if that was the cause.

Thankfully the PC's seem to be ok but definatelly food for thought, everything was on surge protection plugs can only wonder if the cable moden took a direct hit from the coax cable that runs up the side of my building straight into the VM modem and took the switch next to it?
 
Thankfully the PC's seem to be ok but definatelly food for thought, everything was on surge protection plugs can only wonder if the cable moden took a direct hit from the coax cable that runs up the side of my building straight into the VM modem and took the switch next to it?
If that was an incoming path, then what was the outgoing path? No outgoing path means no damage. A surge does not enter, do damage and stop. First that current is everywhere in a path through the sky, through the modem, and maybe kilometers to distant earthborne charges. Much later, something in that path fails - ie the modem.

Irrelevant if wires were overhead or underground. Risk remains same. If cable was properly installed, then it had best protection. A wire from the cable to earth. No protector required. And therefore not an incoming path.

So what happens if a surge is incoming on underground AC power? All but maybe one wire have no connection to earth. A direct strike far down the street is incoming to every household electronics. But a hunt for earth only found a path via the modem.

Damage is often on the outgoing path. That would be via a modem to the properly earthed cable. Nothing inside will avert that hunt. Once permitted inside, that transient current will hunt for and damage a best connection to earth.

Adjacent protectors did little if anything. Better protection was already inside every appliance. Modem, as the best path to earth, actually was doing protection. Once it because a best path from cloud to distant earthborne charges, then nothing inside the flat will avert that current flow.

To have damage means an incoming and a completely different outgoing path existed. Damage on the cable side of that modem means that may have been the outgoing path. Since lightning is rare in the UK, consumers typically should not see damage. But the UK also has virtually no surge protection - which is what adjacent power strips essentially are. They do not even claim to protect from this type of transient. And in some cases can make damage easier.
 
Seen a fair few appliances die from lightning strikes so I'd go with no. OK, I grew up in the country with overhead power & telephone lines so maybe not a big worry in cities, but certainly not risk free.

I've heard people say its impossible but having seen it happen I'm inclined to disagree!

Edit: Some interesting information floating about. Not sure I agree with the 'no induced effects' given the amount of effort that goes into dealing with induced voltages in power grids. Also note that current is caused by potential difference on a connected path - that path does not need to be from cloud to ground. Live and Neutral potential difference bigger than expected is a problem too! This can be caused by lightning strikes without them ever hitting the power line/your house etc directly.

http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pes/lpdl/archive/rachidislides.pdf
 
Last edited:
I live in the countryside so have overhead lines and the electric almost always goes off in a storm. I have a UPS (for power cuts) that also offers guaranteed lightening protection so I don't need to worry about lightning strikes doing damage. The UPS has already come in useful a couple of times including the recent storm. But before then I always risked it anyway.
 
Last edited:
I have a UPS that offers guaranteed lightening protection so I don't need to worry about lightening strikes doing damage.
If it did that, then you can post the manufacturer spec number that makes that claim. No such UPS exists. In fact, a UPS (not in battery backup mode) connects the appliance directly to AC mains. Where is that protection? How does a 2 cm part stop what three kilometers of sky could not?

Reasons why your UPS has no such protection are too numerous. However, if it does lightning protection, then post the manufacturer specification number that says so.

No spec number means a subjective claim - the first indication of a scam.
 
If it did that, then you can post the manufacturer spec number that makes that claim. No such UPS exists. In fact, a UPS (not in battery backup mode) connects the appliance directly to AC mains. Where is that protection? How does a 2 cm part stop what three kilometers of sky could not?

Reasons why your UPS has no such protection are too numerous. However, if it does lightning protection, then post the manufacturer specification number that says so.

No spec number means a subjective claim - the first indication of a scam.

Most brands state they come with a guarantee. I don't know if it actually protects you but since the brands are pretty well known, I have a Cyberpower BS series, I don't think it is a scam. Perhaps they just offer a guarantee since so few people would need to make a claim but it doesn't offer any protection. Perhaps they do bury something in the t&cs though.

My point was more that I could make a claim if it happened rather than it actually protecting me though. It states it has a €25,000 lifetime guarantee. Though I haven't ever needed to make a claim so I don't really know how easy it would be.
 
Though I haven't ever needed to make a claim so I don't really know how easy it would be.
The lesson is standard in free markets. Often a product with a largest guarantee is the worst product. That's the marketing department trying to promote myths. If a warranty proves quality, then GM cars are vastly superior to Honda, Hyundai, and Toyota. Good luck getting GM to honor most warranties. Even my dealer was screwed when extensive warranty work to a new and yet unsold car was rejected. Because two tires had low air pressure.

A warranty for an ineffective protector has many exemptions. So that your claim need not be honored. Did you read its extensive fine print? Worry about actual protection; not some sales gimmick.

So how good is the protection? Typically near zero. Why put a €25,000 warranty on something that features near zero protection? Protection so tiny they they will not even list a joules number in their specifications.

Serious brand names include Siemens, ABB, Keison, Weidmuller, AEL Group, and General Electric. They don't hype a large warranty. Their products are known for integrity.
 
Many years ago, a lightning strike killed my NTL/Virgin Modem and the Etherport on my Motherboard. Had to get a new Modern posted which took Virgin two weeks (Yes I still bloody remember Virgin!) and buy a Internet PCI card to connect once more.

I think the lightning strike must had hit the exchange down the road for it to happen.

So because of that, I normally disconnect everything if the storm is close though the last two I didn't feel the need too.

If the lights start to blinker, then I do! :p
 
Back
Top Bottom