Light weights 'better than heavy' for building muscle

Well technically yes. The weight you do 8 reps with will be lighter than the weight you do 3 reps with. That article gives no explanation though and is pretty much useless.
 
Don't think this needs a thread for discussion. The article is very weak and provides no substance.
 
It's all about volume for building muscle. Volume/tonnage will be different with lighter weights vs heavier weights. If you want to build muscle you need high volume - if you can't don't hit the decent amount of volume even with light weights you'll do little in terms of hypertrophy.
 
It's all about volume for building muscle. Volume/tonnage will be different with lighter weights vs heavier weights. If you want to build muscle you need high volume - if you can't don't hit the decent amount of volume even with light weights you'll do little in terms of hypertrophy.

Yes. Just wondered as to the extent the article had any real value. Unfortunately I cannot find a better source to look at it in greater detail. Too many "ifs and buts" if you know what I mean. I still remeber Tom Platz advocating this to some extent though he was just as famous for doing high rep sets consisting of 500lb squats.
 
Last edited:
The article doesn't really say much, but it certainly isn't true that you can't build muscle with high weight/low reps. As Freefalller says, it's all about volume. So you just do more sets...

The professional strength and conditioning coaches that I've spoken to would never do more than 6 reps for most things, even with hypertrophy as the principal goal.
 
Completely pointless article without going into specifics. What are we talking, half the weight, double the reps? More, less? How many sets?

Even if you can get the same results this way, what's the point? At best you double your time in the gym, and why would you want to work with weights so light you couldn't even guesstimate your 1rm?
 
Completely pointless article without going into specifics. What are we talking, half the weight, double the reps? More, less? How many sets?

Even if you can get the same results this way, what's the point? At best you double your time in the gym, and why would you want to work with weights so light you couldn't even guesstimate your 1rm?




Could be useful for people wishing to mix it up which is what a lot of us are doing already and, as mentioned, those with mobility issues. More info here (though not as much as i would have liked):

The research, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, challenges the widely accepted dogma that training with heavy weights -- which can be lifted only six to 12 times before fatigue -- is the best avenue to muscle growth.

"Many older adults can have joint problems which would prevent them training with heavy loads," says Mitchell. "This study shows that they have the option of training with lighter and less intimidating loads and can still receive the benefits."

For the study, a series of experiments were conducted on healthy, young male volunteers to measure how their leg muscles reacted to different forms of resistance training over a period of 10 weeks.

The researchers first determined the maximum weight each subject could lift one time in a knee extension. Each subject was assigned to a different training program for each leg.

In all, three different programs were used in combinations that required the volunteers to complete sets of as many repetitions as possible with their assigned loads -- typically eight to 12 times per set at the heaviest weights and 25-30 times at the lowest weights.

The three programs used in the combinations were:
1.one set at 80% of the maximum load
2.three sets at 80% of the maximum
3.three sets at 30% of the maximum

After 10 weeks of training, three times per week, the heavy and light groups that lifted three sets saw significant gains in muscle volume -- as measured by MRI -- with no difference among the groups. Still, the group that used heavier weights for three sets developed a bit more strength.

The group that trained for a single set showed approximately half the increase in muscle size seen in both the heavy and light groups.

"The complexity of current resistance training guidelines may deter some people from resistance training and therefore from receiving the associated health benefits," says Stuart Phillips, a professor in the Department of Kinesiology and supervisor of the study. "Our study provides evidence for a simpler paradigm, where a much broader range of loads including quite light loads can induce muscle growth, provided it is lifted to the point where it is difficult to maintain good form."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom