If a good chunk of people use one OS, then game developers will happily develop for it.
Unfortunately, Linux is only 0.8% of the desktop market and most of those people are either willing to duel boot or have a console or go without games.
That 0.8% is split between different distros (Ubuntu, Redhat, Gentoo), which are rarely binary compatible. Then there are different versions of each distro (Fiesty/Gutsy). Thats before you start thinking about KDE and Gnome.
If you wrote a game in 2001 for xp, you could get away without patching it for 6 years.
If you wrote game for Linux in 2001 there is little chance you play it now without recompiling it for your kernel, which you would not be allowed to do because it would no doubt be closed source.
While some closed source developers will keep up with the development of Linux for most popular distros, this is an advantage for them because they can sell new versions. Games are different once a game is released and sold, there is little benefit to the writers in keeping it compatible.
Until there are sufficient users of one distro games on Linux will stay hit and miss.
Where did you get 0.8%? Who calculated that? How? Could be more but because its free and distributed on many internet mirrors and cd's, you cant tell.
Also, I would like to update this thread about some Wine news, the wine project ALMOST runs bioshock with a small patch to the source code. It is stopped by a few directx 9 bugs.
Where did you get 0.8%? Who calculated that? How? Could be more but because its free and distributed on many internet mirrors and cd's, you cant tell.
PCPro Reported it:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/127310/linux-doubles-desktop-share.html?searchString=linux+doubles
It was based on website hits.
I would take it with a pinch of salt, since its obtained from many more sites and torrents etc than they can monitor, its even shipped preinstalled. But even though linux has server market there is more windows desktopsI think the comment about windows being a moving target is valid to some extent.. as wine matures more they have the time to implement new windows features more quickly (theoretically).
I think theres a port of wine to OSX but theres not much else they can do other than some form of wineish product. (I would prefer it if Apple just helped develop a open source apple port of wine!)