Linux N00b - What distro do I want?

haha, for a starter distro to install and go; Ubuntu is fantastic. For a distro to learn linux on it's horrific, the amount of vanilla code and linux standards are well.... non existant, which makes it possiby one of the worst distros for learning.
+1

I'd vote fedora as a good learning distro.
 
The Lab PCs are dualbooting XP and Linux, and from Windows we have Remote Desktop access to Solaris...

...We've been told that we'll need access to Unix (Linux) outside of the labs

What does the university use? Surely they made a suggestion of which distro to go with?

I'd probably agree with what a few others have said in that if you want to learn rather than have an install-and-go distro, something like Debian or Fedora would be a good choice.

But I'm going to assume a lot of the course will be based around working from a shell. I'm just learning myself but from what I understand, which distro you choose shouldn't matter to much. Once your learn your way around something like BASH you should be able to transfer your knowledge to other distros and shells fairly easily and quickly
 
I always used to play around with Suse, RHEL, Ubuntu, etc but I only truly got my head around linux when I went for Archlinux and I have never looked back. Ubuntu is a great system but a nightmare to learn linux on as it does exactly sweet FA the way it should do.
 
Use Debian.
Avoid Ubuntu like the plague. Ubuntu is "Baby's First Distro" - it's for people who want a working desktop, not who want to learn how to use *nix.

If you want to learn a bit more: Arch, FreeBSD
Nightmare mode: Gentoo.
 
I'm just posting to register my vote that Ubuntu is a very misleading distro to learn on. There is a LOT of stuff they have segregated from the rest of the world of Linux - so much so that they have become hypocritical (wrt linux vs windows and the entire reason for Ubuntu's existence) :p
 
Thanks for all the replies guys :).

I had a poke around and the Lab PCs use Gentoo. Most n00bs seem to be going for Ubuntu, but there's some nerds :P that have their computers only running Linux anyways.

I guess the beauty of me doing it through VMs is that I can have as many different ones as I want as and when I want them!
 
lol :p, Gentoo is lovely to use (but understandable comment) - one of the more difficult to install but has always been incredibly easy to maintain in comparison to some of the other distro's I've used :)

Personally I prefer the way Arch and FreeBSD work makes way more sense to me than even debian.

FreeBSD is a good fun way to throw your self in at the deep end! (same for Gentoo if you have a fair bit of time to really learn, which I did at 16). Id say they are all a bit more logical to learn (arch is also a good shout) as they tend to demonstrate some of the inner workings and how to set up a working system, instead of set up a system then force it to work (which has been the case and experience with Debian based stuff as its fun to try and break them a little...)

Personally id bash a cheapy core2 system together in the corner (original c2d parts arnt to expensive now) and just have a whole breakable system in the corner to learn from :D (just dont do a Gentoo p2 as no one thought that was cool when I showed off its ability to do sound and scummvm!)
 
Hello world.

My PC is a MacBook Pro and apparently OSX isn't close enough to Unix :(.
Um.. OSX IS built on Unix. That's a bit like saying Solaris isn't close enough to unix...

Why not just use Macports?
 
Last edited:
lots of people are saying Debian, Mint or Ubuntu for one reason or another.

I am going to throw in Mint Debian Edition, like regular Mint but based directly of Debian rather than off Ubuntu (which is based on Debian). Less easy to use than Regular Mint but easier than Debian. Just a suggestion though it may be the worst of both world for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom