Its a shame someone died, but I really have to take issue with the article and how it is worded.
It does appear to be quite an 'anti' article.
I think he has made an unfortunate error of judgement and someone has paid a high price for it. His actions of beeping his horn could have possibly been that he realised that and was genuinely trying to warn people to move in an attemt to avoid hitting them. However personally I think it more likely that in such circumstances the last thing on your mind would be the horn as your focus would be on trying to stop and avoid contact with a pedestrian.
It could be that he sounded his horn at the woman 'witness' because she stepped out in front of him and in that moment his attention was on her and not on the road ahead and when he looked round he was confronted by another pedestrian and couldn't stop.
But the fact does remain that he was speeding, and whilst I suspect speed was only one factor in the incident it proved to be the decisive one. Had he been travelling at 30 his poor decision to overtake may still have resulted in him hitting the pedestrian, but she may of survived. If this is the case then it would be a poor decision that was exacerbated by speed, and not speed in itself that was the cause of the accident. If not, then the accident could be attributed to excessive speed only.
I cant help feeling that his sentence is at the lower end of the death by dangerous driving law, as he could potentially be sentenced to 14 years in prison. As such I suspect there were mitigating circumstance in his favour that caused the Judge to show discretion and not impose a more harsh sentence.
My condolences to Ms. Catovsky's family of course, but I dont think Mr. Hackshaws actions were a deliberate attempt to flagrantly disregard the law and cause harm to another individual.
I found this to be an interesting read:
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/death_by_dangerous_driving/
Cheers
Buff