The average worker at my firm is now 160% productive.
How is this measured? It reads like an office buzzphrase.
The average worker at my firm is now 160% productive.
It was to illustrate the point. Productivity is measured in pure dollars, and we are punching massively despite the pandemic.How is this measured? It reads like an office buzzphrase.
Tbf I work with a lot of folk like BUDFORCE. They can have a lot of potential but most of the time they excel in making everything seem worse than it is, and would much rather be benign than drive any change. They are often applauded when they leave as it frees a spot up for someone who wants to make a difference.
See: drifter.
The simple answer is the performance element of salaried pay. Both employee A and B can attain a performance element to the pay packet if they meet or exceed X or Y goals. It is a win-win-win as the business can avoid hiring employee C, both employee A and B can get paid more or chose to keen an even keel and do the bare minimum. Unfortunately humans in the work place are all too often "managed" (i.e. McDonalds model) rather than "lead". It all goes back to the school system of ticking boxes rather than thinking outside of the box.If anything it emphasis the method for working out a paid salary is not always correct, or even the best method.
If you've got employee A and employee B doing pretty much the same work, but B can do it in half the time. Do you A) ask employee B to do more work - his hourly rate is the same as employee A but his productivity is essentially twice as much, causing unhappiness in employee B as they will feel like they're doing twice the work compared to their colleague, B) ask employee B to do more work, but pay them twice the amount (or X times the amount that they are productive over employee A), causing unhappiness in employee A as they will now feel that they're being underpaid. Or C) accept that employee B is quicker at their job than employee A and assuming no mistakes in their work etc, then you just accept that employee B will have a lot more downtime than employee A.
You couldn't even take the approach of paying them by the hour, as employee B would just slow down so he gets the same amount of money.
probably more to do with lack of sleep = lower immune system and increased stress, = struggle to sleepNice how the BBC managed to insert a racial element into an article about working hours. Just can't help themselves, can they.
That aside, this is really about stress, isn't it? And prolonged periods of stress and pressure.
The mortality rate for newly retired people is shockingly high, even amongst those who retire early.
I think you're describing exercise there.probably more to do with lack of sleep = lower immune system and increased stress, = struggle to sleep
going round in a circle.
seen loads of people on forums asking if others take something to help them sleep... seems to becoming normal these days.
I bet driving for ubereats etc on a bicycle must play hell on your body.
bad hours are the most profitable hours... and constantly cycling all over, most of them don't seem to have electric bikes or scooters, probably let themselves get dehydrated etc and still aching from the previous days
yea usually you would take a few days break not keep pushing your body to breaking point every day...... it's called slave labourI think you're describing exercise there.
Basically a synonym of the gig economy, so I think we ultimately agree in the endyea usually you would take a few days break not keep pushing your body to breaking point every day...... it's called slave labour
The mortality rate for newly retired people is shockingly high, even amongst those who retire early.
That aside, this is really about stress, isn't it? And prolonged periods of stress and pressure.
Think its got to be more complex than just long hours.
Probably because by the time they finally decide to retire it's too late. Nobody is going to wish they had worked harder/longer on their deathbed.The mortality rate for newly retired people is shockingly high, even amongst those who retire early.
The mortality rate for newly retired people is shockingly high, even amongst those who retire early.
Probably because by the time they finally decide to retire it's too late. Nobody is going to wish they had worked harder/longer on their deathbed.
Considering the way the retirement age is going up and up a lot of people won't make it.
I have a physical job, no way I could do it in my late 60's so anyone that doesn't make provisions to give them options as they get older is screwed.
Very good point imo.I think a potential factor is how much of an individual's identity is tied up with their job. If you've been living the job for 40 years and always introduce yourself as a (insert profession here) then the impact of no longer having that identity, network and reason to get up in the morning can hit some people hard.
Which is incredibly sad.I think a potential factor is how much of an individual's identity is tied up with their job. If you've been living the job for 40 years and always introduce yourself as a (insert profession here) then the impact of no longer having that identity, network and reason to get up in the morning can hit some people hard.